A World History of Nineteenth-Century Archaeology: Nationalism, Colonialism, and the Past (Oxford Studies in the History of Archaeology)

(Sean Pound) #1

objects, including codices, that were subsequently shipped to Spain. One of
the assemblages so formed was a group of about 260 objects sent by Herna ́n
Corte ́s in 1522 that included cloaks and feathered items, and others of jade and
gold (ibid.30). The study of how these were distributed by Emperor Charles V
all over Europe starts with a trail of family presents, including some to his
family in Austria (some of which are now in the Ethnographic Museum of
Vienna), and others to family closer to home in Spain, which were subse-
quently given out to other family members and friends (Cabello 1992a). Some
of the material coming from America became the focus of intellectual interest.
TheWrst objects known to have ended up in a sort of public collection were a
cazabi and a hammock that Father Francisco Ruiz gave Cardinal Cisneros.
These were placed in an apparently ephemeral museum lodged in the univer-
sity he had created, the Complutense University (Alcina Franch 1995: 22).
Many of the objects that arrived in Europe were incorporated into private
collections, either as a small part of the collection, or as the most important
exhibits. An example of theWrst type was the Italian Ulisse Aldrovandi
(1522–1605), who displayed an Aztec ceremonial knife and a mosaic mask
in his collections (ibid.23). Much more American material had been gathered
by the Count of Guimera ́, Esquilache and Vicencio Juan de Lastanosa in
seventeenth-century Spain. Not only objects were dispatched to Spain at this
time; indigenous people were also sent there, starting an ethnographic tradition
of living human exhibits that would endure until the early twentieth century.
Columbus himself sent some American natives to Spain as ‘gifts’ to the Queen
Isabella as did other individuals such as Father Bartolome ́de las Casas.
An earlier political use of antiquities to foster the creation of a national
past—parallel to that taking place in Scandinavia, but not under royal
subsidy—can be found in the seventeenth-century university professor who
was also a priest and colonial administrator, Carlos de Sigu ̈enza y Go ́ngora
(1645–1700). He was a creole, the son of Spaniards but born in Mexico. When a
triumphal arch to welcome the new Spanish viceroy was being planned, he
argued that ancient local motifs should be used to adorn it instead of the
customary classical motifs. As he put it, ‘the love which we owe our country
enjoins us to cast aside fables and to search out more convincing subjects with
which to adorn this so triumphal portal’ (in Bernal 1980: 52–3). As a result,
instead of classical gods, Mexican ‘emperors’ were chosen as decoration.
Sigu ̈enza created a library of sources for the study of the Mexican past and
showed interest in archaeological sites such as Teotihuacan and, more particu-
larly, its Pyramid of the Moon that he tried to excavate (Bernal 1980: 50;
Scha ́velzon 1983). He was one of theWrst to put forward the idea that Mexican-
ness was the positive result of the mixture between natives and Spaniards.


40 Early Archaeology of Great Civilizations

Free download pdf