Food Biochemistry and Food Processing (2 edition)

(Wang) #1

BLBS102-c32 BLBS102-Simpson March 21, 2012 14:2 Trim: 276mm X 219mm Printer Name: Yet to Come


32 Starch Synthesis in the Potato Tuber 625

Frazier, et al. (eds.),Starch Structure and Functionality.The
Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, pp. 196–203.
Jobling SA. 2004. Improving starch for food and industrial applica-
tions.Curr Opin Plant Biol7 (in press).
Jobling SA, et al. 2002. Production of a freeze-thaw-stable potato
starch by antisense inhibition of three starch synthase genes.
Nature Biotech20: 295–299.
Kammerer B, et al. 1998. Molecular characterization of a carbon
transporter in plastids from heterotrophic tissues: The glucose
6-phosphate phosphate antiporter.Plant Cell10: 105–117.
Keeling PL, et al. 1988. Starch biosynthesis in developing wheat
grains. Evidence against the direct involvement of triose phos-
phates in the metabolic pathway.Plant Physiol87: 311–319.
Kortstee AJ, et al. 1998. The influence of an increased degree of
branching on the physio-chemical properties of starch from ge-
netically modified potato.Carb Poly37: 173–184.
Kossmann J, et al. 1992. Cloning and expression analysis of the
plastidic fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase coding sequence: Circum-
stantial evidence for the transport of hexoses into chloroplasts.
Planta188: 7–12.
Kossmann J, et al. 1999. Cloning and functional analysis of a cDNA
encoding a starch synthase from potato (Solanum tuberosum
L.) that is predominantly expressed in leaf tissue.Planta208:
503–511.
Kossmann J, Lloyd J. 2000. Understanding and influencing starch
biochemistry.Crit Rev Plant Sci19: 171–226.
Kuipers AGJ, et al. 1994. Formation and deposition of amylose
in the potato tuber starch granule are affected by the reduction
of granule bound starch synthase gene expression.Plant Cell6:
43–52.
Leggewie G, et al. 2003. Overexpression of the sucrose transporter
SoSUT1 in potato results in alterations in leaf partitioning and
in tuber metabolism but has little impact on tuber morphology.
Planta217: 158–167.
Lloyd JR, et al. 1999a. Simultaneous antisense inhibition of two
starch synthase isoforms in potato tubers leads to accumulation
of grossly modified amylopectin.Biochem J338: 515–521.
Lloyd JR, et al. 1999b. The influence of alterations in ADPglucose
pyrophosphorylase activities on starch structure and composition
in potato tubers.Planta209: 230–238.
Loef I, et al. 2001. Increased levels of adenine nucleotides modify
the interaction between starch synthesis and respiration when
adenine is supplied to discs from growing potato tubers.Planta
212: 782–791.
Lorberth R, et al. 1998. Inhibition of a starch-granule-bound protein
leads to modified starch and the repression of cold sweetening.
Nature Biotech16: 473–477.
Lu Y, Sharkey TD. 2004. The role of amylomaltase in maltose
metabolism in the cytosol of photosynthetic cells.Planta218:
466–473.
Marshall J, et al. 1996. Identification of the major isoform of starch
synthase in the soluble fraction of potato tubers.Plant Cell8:
1121–1135.
M ̈uller-Rober B, et al. 1992. Inhibition of ADPglucose pyrophos- ̈
phorylase in transgenic potatoes leads to sugar storing tubers and
influences tuber formation and the expression of tuber storage
protein genes.EMBO J11: 1229–1238.
Neuhaus HE, Emes MJ. 2000. Nonphotosynthetic metabolism in
plastids.Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol51: 111–140.

Niittyl ̈a T, et al. 2004. A previously unknown maltose transporter
essential for starch degradation in leaves.Science303: 87–89.
Pilling E, Smith AM. 2003. Growth ring formation in the starch
granules of potato tubers.Plant Physiol132: 365–371.
Preiss J. 1988. Biosynthesis of starch and its regulation. In: J Preiss,
(ed.),The Biochemistry of Plants, Academic Press, San Diego,
pp. 181–254.
Regierer B, et al. 2002. Starch content and yield increase as a result
of altering adenylate pools in transgenic plants.Nature Biotech
20: 1256–1260.
Ritte G, et al. 2002. The starch-related R1 protein is an alpha-glucan,
water dikinase.Proc Natl Acad Sci USA99: 7166–7171.
Ritte G, et al. 2004. Phosphorylation of transitory starch is increased
during degradation.Plant Physiology(in press).
Sch ̈afer-Pregl R, et al. 1998. Analysis of quantitative trait loci
(QTLs) and quantitative trait alleles (QTAs) for potato tuber yield
and starch content.Theo Appl Gen97: 834–846.
Scheidig A, et al. 2002. Down regulation of a chloroplast-targeted
beta-amylase leads to a starch-excess phenotype in leaves.Plant
J30: 581–591.
Schwall GP, et al. 2000. Production of a very-high amylose potato
starch by inhibition of SBE A and B.Nature Biotech18: 551–554.
Sene M, et al. 2000. Quantitative trait loci affecting amylose, amy-
lopectin and starch content in maize recombinant inbred lines.
Plant Physiol Biochem38: 459–472.
Shannon JC, et al. 1998. Brittle-1, an adenylate translocator,
facilitates transfer of extra-plastidial synthesized ADPglucose
into amyloplasts of maize endosperms.Plant Physiol117:
1235–1252.
Slattery CJ, et al. 2000. Engineering starch for increased quantity
and quality.Trends Plant Sci5: 291–298.
Smith AM, et al. 1995. What controls the amount and structure of
starch in storage organs.Plant Physiol107: 673–677.
———. 1997. The synthesis of the starch granule.Annu Rev Plant
Physiol Plant Mol Biol48: 65–87.
Smith AM, et al. 2003. Starch mobilisation in leaves.JExpBot54:
577–583.
Sonnewald U, et al. 1995. A second L-type isozyme of potato glu-
can phophorylase: Cloning, antisense inhibition and expression
analysis.Plant Molecular Biology21: 567–576.
Sonnewald U, et al. 1997. Expression of a yeast invertase in the
apoplast of potato tubers increases tuber size.Nature Biotech15:
794–797.
Stark DM, et al. 1991. Regulation of the amount of starch in plant
tissues.Science258: 287–292.
Sowokinos JR. 2001. Biochemical and molecular control of cold-
induced sweetening in potatoes.Am J Pot Res78: 221–236.
Stitt M, Steup M. 1985. Starch and sucrose degradation. In: R
Douce, DA Day, (eds.),Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology, vol.
18, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 347–390.
Sullivan TD, et al. 1991. Analysis of maizeBrittle-1 alleles and
a defective suppressor mutator inducible allelle.Plant Cell3:
1337–1348.
Sweetlove LJ, et al. 1996. Characterisation of transgenic potato
(Solanum tuberosum) tubers with increased ADPglucose py-
rophosphorylase.Biochem J320: 487–492.
Sweetlove LJ, et al. 1999. The contribution of adenosine 5’-
diphosphoglucose pyrophosphorylase to the control of starch
synthesis in potato tubers.Planta209: 330–337.
Free download pdf