BLBS102-c42 BLBS102-Simpson March 21, 2012 14:27 Trim: 276mm X 219mm Printer Name: Yet to Come
42 Food Allergens 811Table 42.4.Commonly Used Food Allergen Detection MethodsPrincipleLimit of
Detection Advantages/Disadvantages ReferencesProtein-based methods
Rocket immunoelec-
trophoresis
(RIE)Binding of allergen to human
IgE or antibodies raised in
animal followed by
observation in gel2.5 mg/kg Not widely used due to the
laborious procedure.
Semi-quantitative.Besler et al.
2002bEAST inhibition Binding of specific IgE
antibodies to food allergens
bound to a solid phase
followed by measurement1 mg/kg Mainly used for clinical
diagnosis.
Limited commercial products
available due to reliance on
human sera.
Quantitative.Nordlee and
Taylor
1995SDS-PAGE and
immunoblottingProteins are denatured and
separated according to their
molecular mass. The proteins
are then transferred onto a
membrane and detected with
labelled human IgE or
antibody raised in animals.5 mg/kg Complex and time-consuming
procedure.
Reliance on human sera.Scheibe et al.
2001Dot immunoblotting Reaction between sample
protein extracts and
enzyme-labelled specific
antibodies on a nitrocellulose
membrane.Intensity of dot
is proportional
to the amount
of allergen.Semi-quantitative but simple
and inexpensive.Blais and
Phillippe
2000ELISA Detects allergens by
colourimetric reaction formed
by the binding of allergen and
specific enzyme-labelled
antibody.0.05–10 mg/kg Most widely used method.
High specificity and sensitivity.
Rapid ELISA kits for major
allergens are commercially
available.Schubert-
Ullrich
et al. 2009Flow-through
MicroarrayImmobilised allergen specific
antibodies on a microarray
chip react with allergens.1.3 ng/mL for
ovalbuminPowerful tool but still in
infancy stage for food
allergen detection.Shriver-Lake
et al. 2004Optical biosensors,
e.g., surface plasmon
resonance (SPR)Interaction of immobilised
molecules (e.g.
allergen-specific antibodies)
on a sensor surface and a
target molecule (e.g.
allergens) in solution.1–12.5 mg/kg Interaction is measured by
either a resonance angle or
refractive index value.
No need to use labelled
molecules.Yman et al.
2006DNA-based methods
PCR with gel
electrophoresisAmplification of a specific DNA
fragment followed by agarose
gel electrophoresis and
visualisation by staining or
southern blotting.<10 mg/kg Qualitative.
Target DNA is less affected
than protein during
processing and extraction
from food matrices.
Results do not truly represent
actual allergen exposure.Poms et al.
2001Real-time PCR Uses a target-specific
oligonucleotide probe with a
reporter dye and a quencher
dye attached.<10mg/kg Requires costly laboratory
equipments.
Allows for gel-free detection.
RT-PCR kits are available for
various food allergens.Oliver and
Vieths 2004DNA-ELISA Amplified product of specific
DNA fragment is linked with
a specific protein labelled
DNA probe coupled with a
specific enzyme-labelled
antibody.<10mg/kg Semi-quantitative. Poms et al.
2004Source: Adapted from Poms et al. 2004.