Market Failure Due to Externalities 459As with most activities, the marginal cost rises with increasing levels of cleanup.
(The cheapest forms of cleanup are undertaken first.) The marginal benefit of
cleanup falls as health gains from cleanup (although positive) exhibit diminish-
ing returns. The optimal amount of cleanup occurs at Q*, where MB MC, well
short of complete elimination. Beyond this level, the extra benefits are not worth
the costs.^8
The government can promote an output Q* through either pollution fees
or quantity standards. The appropriate fee is set at the value of marginal ben-
efit of pollution reduction. Alternatively, the regulator could attain the same
result by mandating Q* as the minimum abatement standard. When the regu-
lator has perfect knowledge of the marginal benefit and cost schedules, either
regulatory regime can be used to attain the desired result.Marginal Benefits and CostsMarginal benefit of cleanupMarginal
cost of
cleanupOptimal
pollution fee
T = MB* = MC*0%
cleanupQ* 100%
cleanup
Quantity of Pollution Cleaned UpOptimal
cleanup
Q*
QFIGURE 11.2
Optimal Regulation
of an ExternalityThe optimal amount
of cleanup is
determined at Q*,
where the marginal
benefit of cleanup
matches the marginal
cost.(^8) This economic point may seem patently obvious. Nonetheless, it is at odds with the Environmental
Protection Agency’s legislative mandate to promote and improve the quality of the environment
without regard for cost.
c11RegulationPublicGoodsandBenefitCostAnalysis.qxd 9/29/11 1:34 PM Page 459