Sequential Decisions 515
How do we account for the superiority of first pursuing the biogenetic
method? To answer this question, let’s compare the actions under the sequen-
tial and simultaneous programs. The actions are the same in each case, except
when the biogenetic program achieves immediate success. Here the company
need not pursue the biochemical program and so saves the $10 million invest-
ment—a sum it would have spent under simultaneous development. This sav-
ing occurs 20 percent of the time (when the biogenetic program is successful).
Pursue
biochemical
Pursue
biogenetic
program
first
Biogenetic
succeeds
Biogenetic
fails
Do not pursue
biochemical
Biochemical
not perfected
Biochemical
perfected
74.4
.8
.2
48
$180
48
.7
.3
$20
$60
–$20
FIGURE 12.5
Sequential R&D:
Biogenetic First
By trying the
biogenetic program
first (and following
with the other
program if necessary),
the drug company
maximizes its expected
profit.
FIGURE 12.6
Summary of
Pharmaceutical
Company’s R&D
Options
Simultaneous R&D
$72.4
Biogenetic R&D
$20
Sequential R&D: biochemical first
$72.4
Sequential R&D: biogenetic first
$74.4
Biochemical R&D
$68
Do not invest
$0
c12DecisionMakingunderUncertainty.qxd 9/29/11 1:34 PM Page 515