Optimal Auctions 689
L12
n 1n 1
U
E(v2nd)E(vmax)
n 1
n 1
n
n 1
FIGURE 16.3
Expected Prices When
Buyer Values Are
Uniformly Distributed
The English and sealed-
bid auctions have
identical revenues.
the average price (corresponding to the second-highest buyer value) achieved
by an English auction.
Now let’s compare this to the result in a sealed-bid auction. Here the win-
ning buyer bases his bid on vmax, the highest outstanding value. The E(vmax) is
also shown in the figure. But the winning bidder shades his optimal bid below
his private value. In equilibrium, his bid corresponds to the expectation of the
next-highest value, E(v2nd), so the degree of shading exactly balances the
advantage of basing the bid on the highest value. In the uniform case, his value
is n/(n 1) toward U, but he applies the factor (n 1)/n in shading his bid
below his value (see Equation 16.4). Multiplying n/(n 1) by (n 1)/n
results in an expected winning sealed bid exactly (n 1)/(n 1) of the way
toward U. This is exactly the same price as in the English auction.
CHECK
STATION 5
Suppose there are four bidders with values independently and uniformly distributed
between 0 and 100. Compute the expected price at an English auction. Write down the
typical buyer’s equilibrium strategy in a sealed-bid auction and then compute E(vmax)
and E(bmax). Confirm that the auctions deliver the same expected price.
Revenue equivalence should be viewed as a benchmark, a result that holds
in a prescribed set of circumstances. As we shall see, modifying the basic auc-
tion setting can confer a revenue advantage on one type of auction or the other.
For instance, suppose the private-value model is replaced by a common-value
setting. One can show that in the common-value setting, the English auction produces
greater revenue, on average, than the sealed-bid auction.Although the proof of this
result requires advanced mathematical methods, the intuition is readily
grasped.^13 Recall that, in the common-value setting, buyers must discount their
bids below their private estimates to avoid the winner’s curse. Roughly speak-
ing, the greater the uncertainty about the item’s value, the greater is this bid
discount. (The discount also increases with the number of bidders.) The next
point to recognize is that a buyer faces less uncertainty in the English auction
than in the sealed-bid auction. The English auction conveys more information
(^13) The first formulation and proof of this result can be found in P. Milgrom and R. Weber, “A
Theory of Auctions and Competitive Bidding,” Econometrica(1982): 1089–1122.
c16AuctionsandCompetitiveBidding.qxd 9/26/11 1:09 PM Page 689