728
Table 31.4.
Comparison of Pathogen Subtyping and Verification Methods
Amount of
Method
Advantages
Disadvantages
DNA required
RFLP
- Simplicity
- Requires pure cultures of pathogen
3–5
g
- Can be done with restriction
- Many bands to compare; confusing,
endonucleases for serotype
may be hard to see differences
level discrimination or combined
- Cannot compare organisms at the genus or
with PCR for lineage comparisons
family level
- Partial digestion and faint bands may be a
problem
AFLP
- PCR to amplify a few genes and simplify
- Requires pure cultures of pathogen
10–100 ng
result analysis
- Cannot compare organisms at the genus or
- Can compare differences between bands on a gel
family level
- Fewer bands to compare than with RFLP• Can compare among labs
RAPD
- Universal primers that are not gene specific
- Requires pure cultures of pathogen
10 ng
- Is not very reproducible between gels or labs• Cannot compare organisms at the genus or
family level
Ribotyping
- Similar to RFLP, but visualizes only bands
- Requires pure cultures of pathogen
1
g
correlating to the
rrn
portion of ribosomes
so fewer bands to compare
- Can compare organisms at the genus and
family level
Pulsed-field
- PulseNet database available to
- Time consuming—3 days for results
Measured by
gel
coordinate and compare
- Requires pure cultures of pathogen
turbidity of
Electrophoresis
results—can track outbreaks
- Patterns may change after intestinal
culture–lysis
- Can compare differences between
passage; differences in patterns may
and DNA
bands on a gel
not indicate actual strain
digestion
- Results are comparable among labs
differences
performed in
- Cannot compare organisms at the
agarose plugs
genus or family level
FISH
- May detect one pathogen in a mixed
- Cells must be fixed and
Single cell
community of microbes
permeabilized before visualization
level
Source:
Adapted from Gurtler and Mayall 2001, Savelkuoh et al. 1999.