Disadvantages:
- relatively fragile theoretical grounding of the scales (BI, themes and
occupational groups); - difficult interpretation of the contents of the pair of items in the
questionnaire; - relatively low longitudinal / temporal predictability of the profiles obtained;
- insufficient description of the reference groups on the basis of which the final
form of the questionnaire was drawn up; - relatively long interval needed for interpretation of results.
Bibliography
Anastasi, Anne (1990). Psychological Testing. (6th ed.). NY: Macmillan Publishing
Company. p. 572-575.
Berk, L. A.; Fekken, G. C. (1990). Person reliability evaluated in the context of
vocational interest assessment. In: Journal of Vocational Behavior, 37 (1), p.
7-16.
Brown, D. T. (1989). Review of the Jackson Vocational Interest Survey. In: J. C. Conoley
and J. J. Kramer (Eds.). Tenth mental measurements yearbook. Lincoln, NE:
Buros Institute, University of Nebraska-Lincoln.
Covington, J. D. (1992). Review of the Jackson Vocational Interest Survey. In: J. T.
Kapes and M. M. Mastie (Eds.). A counselor’s guide to vocational guidance
instruments. Falls Church, VA: National Vocational Guidance Association.
Davidshofer, C. O. (1985). Review of the Jackson Vocational Interest Survey. In: J. V.
Mitchell (Ed.). Ninth mental measurements yearbook. Vol. I. Lincoln, NE:
University of Nebraska Press.
Davidshofer, C. O. (1988). Review of the Jackson Vocational Interest Survey. In: J. T.
Kapes and M. M. Mastie (Eds.). A counselor’s guide to career assessment
instruments. (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: National Career Development
Association.
Gladstone, L.; Trimmer, H. W. (1985). Factors of predicting success in training and
employment for WIN clients in Southern Nevada. In: Journal of Employment
Counseling, 22(2), 59-69.
Jackson, D. N. (1971). The dynamics of structured personality tests: 1971. In:
Psychological Review , 78, p. 229-248.