4.5 Self-consistency and exchange: Hartree–Fock theory 57
therefore calculate the expectation value of the energy for an arbitrary Slater determ-
inant using the Born–Oppenheimer Hamiltonian and then minimise the result with
respect to the spin-orbitals in the determinant.
We write the Hamiltonian as follows:
H=
∑
i
h(i)+
1
2
∑
i,j;i=j
g(i,j) with
g(i,j)=
1
|ri−rj|
and
h(i)=−
1
2
∇i^2 −
∑
n
Zn
|ri−Rn|
.
(4.34)
h(i)depends onrionly andg(i,j)onriandrj. Writing the Slater determinantψas
a sum of products of spin-orbitals and using the orthonormality of the latter, it can
easily be verified that this determinant is normalised, and for the matrix element of
the one-electron part of the Hamiltonian, we find (see Problem 4.3)
〈
AS
∣∣
∣∣
∣
∑
i
h(i)
∣∣
∣∣
∣
AS
〉
=N·
(N− 1 )!
N!
∑
k
〈ψk|h|ψk〉
=
∑
k
〈ψk|h|ψk〉=
∑
k
∫
dxψk∗(x)h(r)ψk(x). (4.35)
By
∫
dxwe denote an integral over the spatial coordinates and a sum over the
spin-degrees of freedom as usual.
The matrix element of the two-electron termg(i,j)for a Slater determinant not
only gives a nonzero contribution when the spin-orbitals in the left and right hand
sides of the inner product occur in the same order, but also forkandlinterchanged
on one side (the derivation is treated in Problem 4.3):
〈
AS
∣∣
∣∣
∣∣
∑
i,j
g(i,j)
∣∣
∣∣
∣∣AS
〉
=
∑
k,l
〈ψkψl|g|ψkψl〉−
∑
k,l
〈ψkψl|g|ψlψk〉. (4.36)
In this equation, the following notation is used:
〈ψkψl|g|ψmψn〉=
∫
dx 1 dx 2 ψk∗(x 1 )ψl∗(x 2 )
1
|r 1 −r 2 |
ψm(x 1 )ψn(x 2 ). (4.37)
In summary, we obtain for the expectation value of the energy:
E=
∑
k
〈ψk|h|ψk〉+
1
2
∑
kl
[〈ψkψl|g|ψkψl〉−〈ψkψl|g|ψlψk〉]. (4.38)