Addiction Medicine: Closing the Gap between Science and Practice

(lu) #1

possible, the extent to which they have clinical


utility for screening versus assessment purposes.


General Substance Use Screening


and Assessment Tools*


Alcohol, Smoking and Substance


Involvement Screening Test (ASSIST)


Developed by the World Health Organization
(WHO) in 1997, the Alcohol, Smoking and
Substance Involvement Screening Test is an
interviewer-administered screening tool for
primary care settings.^12 The eight-question
instrument measures the frequency of current
and lifetime use of tobacco, alcohol and illicit
drugs and the problems adult respondents have
experienced due to their use.^13 Each question is
structured to identify tobacco, alcohol, cannabis,
cocaine, amphetamine-type stimulant, inhalant,
sedative, hallucinogen, opioid and other drug
use and related problems resulting from use.^14

Each question has a set of responses with
corresponding numerical scores. For tobacco
and illicit drugs, the WHO recommends that
patients with specific substance involvement
scores of three or lower receive no intervention
aside from information about the substances
they use; those with scores between four and 26
receive a brief intervention; and those with
scores of 27 or higher receive an intensive
intervention or treatment. For alcohol, this
breakdown is 10 or lower, 11 to 26 and 27 or
higher, respectively.† 15

The ASSIST requires training to administer
properly.^16 The WHO recommends practitioners
understand why screening is important; how to
implement, administer and score the screening
instrument; and how to conduct follow-up
activities to help patients at different levels of
risk. Trainings also should include role-play and
supervised practice.^17

Although it is copyrighted, the instrument along
with the scoring manual are available free of
charge through the WHO.^18
* Select substance-specific screening tools are
presented later in the appendix.
† The total substance involvement score is calculated
by adding scores based on a patient’s responses to all
eight questions across all 10 substance categories.

Determining the Clinical Utility of a
Screening or Assessment Instrument

The psychometric properties of instruments
typically are established prior to their use in
research or clinical settings. The main
properties examined are validity and
reliability.^4

There are three primary measures of validity:
construct, content and criterion validity.^5
Construct validity determines the degree to
which the instrument is related to the
theoretical concept being measured;^6 content
validity is the extent to which items included in
the instrument represent the area of interest that
the instrument is designed to measure;^7 and
criterion validity determines whether the
instrument is related to external criteria,^8 such
as diagnostic criteria for a disease.

Reliability determines whether the instrument
produces consistent results that can be
reproduced.^9 Test-retest reliability refers to the
stability of the instrument in terms of the
consistency of a respondent’s score when
tested multiple times;^10 inter-rater reliability
determines whether the instrument produces
stable results across different observers; and
internal reliability (or consistency) determines
whether the items in a multi-item instrument
correlate with one another.^11

Two other important properties of an
instrument are its sensitivity--its ability to
identify accurately those with a particular
characteristic, in this case a certain level of
substance involvement, as having the
characteristic, and specificity--its ability to
identify accurately those without a particular
characteristic as not having the characteristic.

Although the statistics associated with these
properties are beyond the scope of this report,
these properties are discussed in a general way,
where available and relevant, to help give a
sense of the clinical utility of a particular
instrument.
Free download pdf