13.2 Statistical argument for the development of the Fokker-Planck equation 387This result was for a particular value ofvFand summing over all possiblevFweighted
according to their probability, gives
∆vT|allb,allφ,allvF=−∆tqT^2 q^2 FlnΛ
4 πε^20 μmT∫
vrel
v^3 relfF(vF)dvF. (13.28)The integrand can be expressed in a simpler form by considering that
∂r
∂r=
(
ˆx∂
∂x+ˆy∂
∂y+ˆz∂
∂z)√
x^2 +y^2 +z^2 =r
r(13.29)
and also∂/∂vT=∂/∂vrel.Thus
∂vrel
∂vT=
vrel
vrel(13.30)
and
∂
∂vT
1
vrel=−
1
v^2 relvrel
vrel. (13.31)
Equation (13.28) can therefore be written as
∆vT|allb,allφ,allvF=∆tqT^2 q^2 FlnΛ
4 πε^20 μmT∂
∂vT∫
1
vrelfF(vF)dvF. (13.32)The∂/∂vThas been factored out of the integral becausevTis independent ofvF, the
variable of integration. SincevFis a dummy variable, it can be replaced byv′and since
vTis the velocity of the given incident particle, the subscriptTcan be dropped. After
making these re-arrangements we obtain the desired result,
〈
∆v
∆t〉
=
q^2 TqF^2 lnΛ
4 πε^20 μmT∂
∂v∫
fF(v′)
|v−v′|dv′. (13.33)The averaging procedure for∆v∆vis performed in a similar manner, starting by noting
that
∆v∆v=(
θcosφ,θsinφ,−θ^2 / 2)(
θcosφ,θsinφ,−θ^2 / 2)
(13.34)
and so Eq.(13.25) is replaced by
∆vrel∆vrel|allb,allφ = vrel∆tfF(vF)dvF∫ 2 π0dφ∫λDbπ/ 2bdb×v^2 rel(
θcosφ,θsinφ,−θ^2 / 2)(
θcosφ,θsinφ,−θ^2 / 2)
.
(13.35)
The terms linear insinφorcosφvanish upon performing theφintegration. Also, theˆzˆz
term scales asθ^4 and so may be neglected relative to theˆxxˆandyˆˆyterms which scale as