Environment and aquaculture in developing countries

Table 5 (continued)

Yes

Favorable project

HQ

Less favorable or

Criteria unfavorable project

Relation to natural
environment

Displacca none

or little

Not ao

Replaces one with

the other

Used as an excuse not Is used

to restore natural

environment or uses

restoration funding

Uses few artificial

genetic strains

Not so

No

Is used

Risks escape for

selected strains

into nature

Yes

Cultured stock Native Exotic

Risks to native

species + disease.

hybridization,

extinctions, etc.

None Some, much

Disease, predators

competitors

contmllod by

Biological

means

Chemical means or

by drugs

Fertilizers Organic

Low

Chemical

Output into natural High.

environmcnt - chemical,

organic and physical

Culture subj~ctivity

to diseaue/stress

Low High

Facility design effect
on wildlifc predators

Naturally excludes

birds & mammals

Fish eating ducks,

herons, cormorants

otters, scals, etc.

controlled by gun

ESTHETIC

Culture area Beautiful

WORLD ORDER

Produces food for Developing countries Developed countries

High for developed

countries

Profit flow ratio High for
Developing countries

Necdcd supplies and
most goods from

Developing countries Developed countries

Import of foreign

technology

None Some, much

Needed 'seed' stock
from

Developing countries Developed countries