Human Resources Management for Public and Nonprofit Organizations

(vip2019) #1

234 Human Resources Management for Public and Nonprofi t Organizations


performance of different employees, thus discrediting the supervisor ’ s and
agency ’ s credibility.
Another problem with disingenuous evaluations is that when they are
used for SHRM, the data they provide are inaccurate. Any decisions made
based on the evaluations could prove to be harmful to the future growth
and success of the organization by not recognizing liabilities and identifying
where the agency needs to acquire talent. Inaccurate evaluations also do
not develop individuals (Longenecker & Ludwig, 1990).

Performance Appraisal Techniques


There are three general approaches to performance appraisals: absolute,
comparative, and goal setting.

◆◆◆


  • Absolute methods evaluate the employee without referring directly
    to other employees. Instead, employees are evaluated against their own
    standards. For example, John Doe is evaluated in March and then again
    in September, and his September evaluation is compared to his March
    evaluation. The strengths identifi ed in March should have been maintained,
    and any defi ciencies or problems identifi ed in March should have been
    corrected by September. Absolute evaluations are used most frequently for
    developmental purposes.

  • Comparative methods evaluate the employees in one unit relative
    to everyone else in the group. In March, all of the juvenile probation
    offi cers were evaluated on the same performance dimensions and then
    compared to one another. For example, probation offi cer A received the
    highest ratings in accuracy and timeliness of presentencing investiga-
    tion reports, while probation offi cer C received the lowest rating for
    that dimension. Probation offi cer C, however, received the highest rat-
    ing for number of clients supervised and number of collateral contacts,
    while probation offi cer B received the lowest rating on that dimension.
    Comparative evaluations are used to differentiate levels of performance
    across employees.

  • Goal setting evaluates whether the ratee attained predetermined
    goals. For example, the supervisor and employee agree that the employee
    will prepare seven more grant applications in the next five months to

Free download pdf