Judd, C. M., & McClelland, G. H. (1989).Data analysis: a
model comparison approach. San Diego, CA: Harcourt
Brace Jovanovich.
Judd, C. M., McClelland, G. H., & Culhane, S. E. (1995). Data
analysis: Continuing issues in the everyday analysis of
psychological data. Annual Review of Psychology, 46 ,
433–455.
Kapp, B., Frysinger, R., Gallagher, M., & Hazelton, J. (1979).
Amygdala central nucleus lesions: Effects on heart rate con-
ditioning in the rabbit. Physiology and Behavior, 23 ,
1109–1117.
Katz, S., Lautenschlager, G. J., Blackburn, A. B., & Harris,
F. H. (1990). Answering reading comprehension items with-
out passages on the SAT. Psychological Science, 1 , 122–127.
Kaufman, L., & Rock, I. (1962). The moon illusion, I. Science,
136 , 953–961.
Kaufman, L., & Kaufman, J. (2000). Explaining the moon
illusion.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,
97 , 500–504.
Kelley, K. (2008). Methods for the behavioral, educational,
and social sciences: An R package. Behavioral Research
Methods., 39, 979–984.
Kendall, M. G. (1948).Rank correlation methods. London:
Griffin.
Kennedy, J. J. (1983).Analyzing qualitative data: Introductory
loglinear analysis for behavioral research. New York:
Praeger.
Kenny, D. A., & Judd, C. M. (1986). Consequences of violat-
ing the independence assumption in analysis of variance.
Psychological Bulletin, 99 , 422–431.
Keppel, G. (1973). Design and analysis: A researcher’s hand-
book. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Keselman, H. J., Games, P. A., & Rogan, J. C. (1979). Protect-
ing the overall rate of Type I errors of pairwise comparisons
with an omnibus test statistic. Psychological Bulletin, 86 ,
884–888.
Keselman, H. J., Holland, B., & Cribbie, R. A. (2005). Multi-
ple comparison procedures. In Everitt, B. S. & Howell, D. C.
Encyclopedia of Statistics in Behavioral Sciences. Chich-
ester, England: Wiley.
Keselman, H. J., & Keselman, J. C. (1988). Repeated meas-
ures multiple comparison procedures: Effects of violating
multisample sphericity in unbalanced designs. Journal of
Educational Statistics, 13 , 215–226.
Keselman, H. J., & Rogan, J. C. (1977). The Tukey multiple
comparison test: 1953–1976. Psychological Bulletin, 84 ,
1050–1056.
Keselman, H. J., Rogan, J. C., Mendoza, J. L., & Breen, L. J.
(1980). Testing the validity conditions of repeated measures
Ftests. Psychological Bulletin, 87 , 479–481.
King, D. A. (1986). Associative control of tolerance to the
sedative effects of a short-acting benzodiazepine. Unpub-
lished doctoral dissertation, University of Vermont.
Kirk, R. E. (1968). Experimental design: Procedures for the
behavioral sciences. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.
Kleinbaum, D. G., & Klein, M. (2002). Logistic Regression: A
self-learning text. New York: Springer.
Klemchuk, H. P., Bond, L. A., & Howell, D. C. (1990). Coher-
ence and correlates of level 1 perspective taking in young
children. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 36 , 369–387.
Koele, P. (1982). Calculating power in analysis of variance.
Psychological Bulletin, 92 , 513–516.
Kohr, R. L., & Games, P. A. (1974). Robustness of the analy-
sis of variance, the Welch procedure, and a Box procedure
to heterogeneous variances. The Journal of Experimental
Education, 43 , 61–69.
Landwehr, J. M., & Watkins, A. E. (1987). Exploring data.
Palo Alto, CA: Dale Seymour Publications.
Lane, D. M., & Dunlap, W. P. (1978). Estimating effect size:
Bias resulting from the significance criterion in editorial de-
cisions. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical
Psychology, 31 , 107–112.
Langlois, J. H., & Roggman, L. A. (1990). Attractive faces are
only average. Psychological Science, 1 , 115–121.
Lappe, J. M., Davies, K. M., Travers-Gustafson, D., & Heaney,
R. P. (2006).Vitamin D status in a rural postmenopausal
female population. Journal of the American College of
Nutrition, 25 , 395–402.
Larzelere, R. E., & Mulaik, S. A. (1977). Single-sample tests
for many correlations. Psychological Bulletin, 84 , 557–569.
Latané, B., & Dabbs, J. M., Jr. (1975). Sex, group size, and
helping in three cities. Sociometry, 38 , 180–194.
Lecoutre, B. (1991). A correction for the approximate test in
repeated measures designs with two or more independent
groups. Journal of Educational Statistics, 16,371–372.
Leerkes, E., & Crockenberg, S. (1999). The development of
maternal self-efficacy and its impact on maternal behavior.
Poster presentation at the Biennial Meetings of the Society
for Research in Child Development, Albuquerque, NM, April.
Lehman, E. L. (1993). The Fisher, Neyman-Pearson theories
of testing hypotheses: One theory or two? Journal of the
American Statistical Association, 88 , 1242–1249.
Lenth, R. V. (2001). Some practical guidelines for effective sam-
ple size determination. American Statistician, 55 , 187–193.
Levene, H. (1960). Robust tests for the equality of variance. In
I. Olkin (Ed.), Contributions to probability and statistics.
Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
Lewis, C., & Keren, G. (1977). You can’t have your cake and
eat it too: Some considerations of the error term. Psycholog-
ical Bulletin, 84 ,1150–1154.
Lewis, D., & Burke, C. J. (1949). The use and misuse of the
chi-square test. Psychological Bulletin, 46 , 433–489.
Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (1987). Statistical analysis with
missing data. New York: Wiley.
Lord, F. M. (1953). On the statistical treatment of football
numbers. American Psychologist, 8 , 750–751.
Lord, F. M. (1967). A paradox in the interpretation of group
comparisons. Psychological Bulletin, 68 , 304–305.
Lord, F. M. (1969). Statistical adjustments when comparing
preexisting groups. Psychological Bulletin, 72 , 336–337.730 References