Fury on Earth: A Biography of Wilhelm Reich

14. Ibid.


15. Ibid.


16. Ibid.


17. Ibid.


18. Richard A. Blasband, “An Analysis of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s Scientific
    Evidence Against Wilhelm Reich, Part One: The Biomedical Evidence,” in Greenfield, 349.


19. FDA file.


20. Blasband, op. cit, 35.


21. David Blasband, “United States of America v. Wilhelm Reich (Part II),”JO, 2, 1968, 65.

22.Complaint for Injunction,Feb. 10, 1954, in Greenfield, 279-299.

23.Greenfield,132-133.

24. Elsworth F. Baker, “Wilhelm Reich,”JO, i, 1967, 48.


25. Ibid.


26. WR, “The Response: OROP DESERT,” in Greenfield, 301-303.


27. Ibid., 302.

28.Decree of Injunction, Civil Action No. 1056, March 19, 1954, in Greenfield, 304-307.

29. Greenfield, 153-154.


30. WR,Response to Ignorance(Rangeley, Me.:OIP, 1955), 20.


31. WR, “Biophysical Functionalism and Mechanistic Natural Science,”IJSO, 1, 1942, 97-


32. (The article has been republished in JO, 7, 1974, 5-18.)

32.David Blasband,“United States ofAmerica v.Wilhelm Reich,”JO,I,1965-69.

33. Baker, “Wilhelm Reich,”JO, i, 1967, 49.

34.Letter from Daniel Blain, Med. Dir., Amer. Psychoanalytic Assoc., to Irvin Kerlan, April
5,1954 (FDA file).

35.Letter from Richard L. Frank, Sec. of the Amer. Psychoanalytic Assoc., to Irvin Kerlan,
Act.Med.Dir.,FDA,April 19,1954 (FDA file on WR).

NOTES 485