Fernald, Anne (1984).‘The Perceptual and AffectiveSalience of Mother's Speech to Infants’. In L. Feagan, C. Garvey,
and R. Golinkoff (eds.),The Origins and Growth of Communication. New Brunswick, NJ: Ablex.
Fiengo, Robert (1980).Surface Structure: The Interface of Autonomous Components. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University
Press.
——and Robert May (1994).Indices and Identity. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Fillmore, Charles (1968).‘The Case for Case’. In E. Bach and R. Harms (eds.),Universals in Linguistic Theory,1–90. New
York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
——(1982).‘Towards a DescriptiveFrameworkfor Deixis’. In R. Jarvellaand W. Klein (eds.),Speech, Place, and Action,
31 – 52. New York: Wiley.
——and Beryl Atkins (1992).‘Toward a Frame-Based Lexicon: The Semantics of RISK and its Neighbors’.InA.
Lehrer and E. Kittay (eds.),Frames, Fields, and Contrasts,75–102. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
——and Paul Kay (1993).Construction Grammar Coursebook. Berkeley: Dept. of Linguistics, University of California.
————and Mary Catherine O'Connor (1988).‘Regularity and Idiomaticity in Grammatical Constructions: The
Case ofLet Alone’.Language64: 501–38.
Fisher, Cynthia,D. G. Hall,S. Rakowitz, and LilaGleitman (1994).‘WhenitisBetter toReceivethantoGive:Syntactic
and Conceptual Constraints on Vocabulary Growth’. In Gleitman and Landau (1994: 333–75).
Fitch, W. Tecumseh (2000).‘The Evolution of Speech: A Comparative Review’.Trends in Cognitive Sciences4: 258–67.
Flynn, Suzanne, and Wayne O'Neill (eds.) (1988).Linguistic Theory in Second Language Acquisition. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Fodor, Jerry (1970).‘Three Reasons for Not Deriving“Kill”from“Cause to Die”’.Linguistic Inquiry1: 429–38.
——(1975).The Language of Thought.Cambridge,Mass.: Harvard University Press.
——(1983).The Modularity of Mind. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
——(1987).Psychosemantics: The Problem of Meaning in the Philosophy of Mind.Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
——(1990).A Theory of Content and Other Essays. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
——(1991).‘Informationand Representation’. In P. Hanson(ed.),Information, Language, and Cognition, Oxford: Oxford
University Press.
——(1998).Concepts: Where Cognitive Science Went Wrong. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
——(2000a).The Mind Doesn't Work That Way. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
——(2000b).‘It's All in the Mind: Noa mCho msky and the Argu ments for Internalis m’.Times Literary Supplement,23
June: 3–4.
——, Merrill F. Garrett, and David Swinney (1992).‘A Modular Effect in Parsing’. MS, Rutgers University.
————, Edward Walker, and Cornelia Parkes (1980).‘Against Definitions’.Cognition8: 263–367.
——, and Ernie Lepore (1999).‘Impossible Words?’Linguistic Inquiry30: 445–53.
Forster, Kenneth (1979).‘Levels of Processing and the Structure of the Language Processor’. In W. Cooper and E.
Walker (eds.),Sentence Processing: Psycholinguistic Studies presented to Merrill Garrett,28–85. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
ff
(ff)
#1