Table 1: Comparison of FE, BDWF, and the present simplified approach for dimensionless maximum kinematic pile bending
푀
max
(휔
)/휌 1
푑푑
4
̈
푈
푔
during the harmonic excitation.
Case
퐿/푑 퐸
/퐸푝
푎
퐻
/퐻푎
푏
푉
/푉푎
푏
Previous
휔
푑/푉 1
푎
Computed
휔^1
푑/푉
푎
FE method
훿comp
BDWF method
Error1: %
Simplified results
Error2: %
1
10
500
1
0.58
0.0964
0.0968
709
2.21
760
7.2
752
6.0
2
20
0.0482
0.0484
1253
2.41
1282
2.3
1326
5.8
3
40
0.0241
0.0242
2088
2.63
2196
5.2
2313
10.8
4
10
5000
1
0.0964
0.0968
1854
1.66
1623
−12.5
1921
3.6
5
20
0.0482
0.0484
7718
1.81
8019
3.9
7735
0.2
6
40
0.0241
0.0242
13120
1.97
13320
1.5
13406
2.2
7
20
1000
3
1.5
0.0916
0.0910
508
2.27
515
1.4
555
9.2
8
20
10000
1/3
0.1164
0.1159
1113
1.42
1097
−1.4
1119
0.6
9
20
1
0.1058
0.1056
931
1.55
1070
14.9
663
−28.8
10
20
3
0.0913
0.0910
1482
1.70
1433
−3.3
1547
4.4
11
10
500
1
1.73
0.2310
0.2293
86
2.05
79
−8.1
96
11.6
12
20
0.1155
0.1147
269
2.24
253
−5.9
315
17.2
13
40
0.0578
0.0573
656
2.44
577
−12.0
778
18.7
14
10
5000
1
0.2310
0.2293
273
1.54
266
−2.6
265
−2.9
15
20
0.1155
0.1147
998
1.68
860
−13.8
963
−3.5
16
40
0.0578
0.0573
3054
1.83
2825
−7.5
3144
3.0
17
20
1000
3
3
0.1017
0.1009
1046
2.17
1075
2.8
1331
27.3
18
20
10000
1/3
0.2117
0.2094
875
1.35
896
2.4
1217
39.1
19
20
3
0.1415
0.1403
2949
1.48
3042
3.2
3470
17.7
20
20
3
0.1019
0.1009
4867
1.63
4911
0.9
5608
15.2
21
20
1000
3
6
0.1042
0.1037
1486
2.07
1480
−0.4
2077
39.7
22
20
10000
1/3
0.2897
0.2849
1128
1.29
1274
12.9
1827
62.0
23
20
1
0.1535
0.1526
3809
1.42
4193
10.1
5073
33.2
24
20
3
0.1045
0.1037
6730
1.55
6831
1.5
8675
28.9
(1) Values of previous
휔^1
푑/푉
,FE푎
,훿
comp
, and BDWF computed form a proposed simple analytical expression [
19
].
(2) Error1: percentage error in the BDWF moment compared with the FE moment. Error2: percentage error in the elastic moment compared with the FE moment
.
(3) The values of computed
휔^1
푑/푉
푎
are associated with the computed time interval.