customary, unquestioned ways of behaving or with the entrenched folklore of
premodern societies (cf. Oakeshott 1962 , 123 , 128 – 9 ).
Table 6. 1 identiWes four distinct traditions in the study of political institutions:
formal-legal, idealist, modernist-empiricism, and socialist. Of course, these tradi-
tions are examples. The list is not exhaustive.
3 Where are We Now—Modernist-
Empiricism?
.........................................................................................................................................................................................
For many, the study of political institutions is the story of the ‘‘new institutional-
ism.’’ In outline, the story goes that the new institutionalism was a reaction against
behavioralism. Thus, for Thelen and Steinmo ( 1992 , 3 – 5 ) both historical institu-
tionalism and rational choice are a reaction against behavioralism just as
Table 6.1 Traditions in the study of political institutionsTraditions Modernist-empiricist Formal-legal Idealist SocialistDefinition
of political
institutionFormal rules,
compliance
procedures,
and standard
operating practices
that structure
relationships
between
individuals in
various units
of the polity
and the economyPublic laws that
concern formal
governmental
organizationsInstitutions
express... ideas
about political
authority... and
embody a
continuing approach
to resolving
the issues
which arise
in the relations
between citizen
and governmentThe specific
articulation of
class struggleEckstein
1979: 2Miliband 1977: 19Hall 1986: 19–20
Johnson 1975:
131, 112
Present-day
examplesUSA: New institu-
tionalismsFrench
constitution-
alismUK: Conservative
IdealismPan-European
post-MarxismExamples March and
Olsen 1989Chevallier 2002 Johnson 2004 Laclau 199092 r. a. w. rhodes