political science

(Wang) #1

Fiorina,M. 1992 .Divided Government. New York: Macmillan.
Fitzgibbon,R. 1945. Constitutional development in Latin America: a synthesis.American
Political Science Review, 39 ( 3 ): 511 – 22.
Flinders,M. 2002. Shifting the balance? Parliament, the executive and the British consti-
tution.Political Studies, 50 ( 1 ): 23 – 42.
Ganghof, S. forthcoming. Veto points and veto players: a skeptical view. InConsequences of
Democratic Institutions, ed. H. Kitschelt.
GarcI ́aCalderón,F. 1914 .Les de ́mocraties latines de l’Ame ́rique. Paris: Flammarion.
Geddes,B. 1996. Initiation of new democratic institutions in Eastern Europe and Latin
America. Pp. 15 – 42 inInstitutional Design in New Democracies,ed. A. Lijphart and
C. Waisman. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Glaeser, E., LaPorta, R., and Lopez-de-Silanes,F. 2004. Do institutions cause growth?
Journal of Economic Growth, 9 ( 3 ): 271 – 303.
Goodin, R. E. (ed.) 1996 .The Theory of Institutional Design. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Grofman, B. (ed.) 1989 .The Federalist Papers and the New Institutionalism. New York:
Agathon.
—— and Lijphart, A. (eds.) 1986 .Electoral Laws and their Political Consequences.New
York: Agathon.
—— andvanRoozendaal,P. 1997. Modeling cabinet durability and termination.British
Journal of Political Science, 27 : 419 – 51.
Grumm,J. 1958. Theories of electoral systems.Midwest Journal of Political Science, 2 ( 4 ):
357 – 76.
Hammond, T. and Butler,C. 2003. Some complex answers to the simple question ‘‘Do
institutions matter?’’Journal of Theoretical Politics, 15 ( 2 ): 145 – 200.
—— and Miller,G. 1987. The core of the constitution.American Political Science Review,
81 : 1155 – 74.
Hardin,R. 1989. Why a constitution? InThe Federalist Papers and the New Institutionalism,
ed. B. Grofman. New York: Agathon.
Hegre, H., Ellingsen, T., Gates, S., and Gleditsch,N. 2001. Toward a democratic civil
peace?American Political Science Review, 95 ( 1 ): 33 – 48.
Howell, W., Adler, S., Cameron, C., and Riemann,C. 2000. Divided government and
the legislative productivity of Congress, 1945 – 94 .Legislative Studies Quarterly, 25 ( 2 ):
285 – 312.
Huber, J. and Powell,G.B. 1994. Congruence between citizens and policymakers in two
visions of liberal democracy.World Politics, 46 ( 3 ): 291 – 326.
Jennings,I. 1959 .Cabinet Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Katz,R. 1997 .Democracy and Elections. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
King, G. and Ragsdale,L. 1988 .The Elusive Executive. Washington, DC: Congressional
Quarterly.
Krehbiel,K. 1996. Institutional and partisan sources of gridlock: a theory of divided and
uniWed government.Journal of Theoretical Politics, 8 : 7 – 40.
—— 1998 .Pivotal Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lambert,J. 1963 .Ame ́rique Latine: Structures sociales et institutions politiques. Paris: Presses
Universitaires de France.
LaPalombara, J. and Weiner, M. (eds.) 1966 .Political Parties and Political Development.
Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.


comparative constitutions 235
Free download pdf