Derthick,M. 1970 .The InXuence of Federal Grants: Public Assistance in Massachusetts.
Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Donahue,J.D. 1997 .Disunited States. New York: Basic Books.
Dye,T.R. 1990 .American Federalism: Competition Among Governments. Lexington, Mass.:
Lexington Books.
Elazar,D.J. 1962 .The American Partnership: Intergovernmental Cooperation in the Nine-
teenth Century United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
—— 1964. Federal–state collaboration in the nineteenth-century United States.Political
Science Quarterly, 79 : 248 – 81.
—— 1966 .American Federalism: A View from the States. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell.
—— 1981. States as polities in the federal system.National Civic Review, 70 ( 2 ): 77 – 82.
—— 1990 Opening the third century of American federalism: issues and prospects.Annals
of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 509 : 11 – 21.
Enchautegui,M.E. 1997. Welfare payments and other economic determinants of female
migration.Journal of Labor Economics, 15 ( 3 ): 529 – 54.
Figlio, D. N., Kolpin,VanW., and Reid,W.E. 1999. Do states play welfare games?Journal
of Urban Economics, 46 : 437 – 54.
Fosler,R.S. 1988 .The New Economic Role of American States: Strategies in a Competitive
World Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Glendening, P. N. and Reeves,M.M. 1984 .Pragmatic Federalism, 2 nd edn. PaciWc
Palisades, Calif.: Palisades.
Gormley,W.T. 2005. Pragmatic federalism: conXict, cooperation, and the quest for WA.
Unpublished paper.
Grodzins,M. 1960. The federal system in the United States, President’s Commission on
National Goals 1960. Available at: http://pittcat.edu.
Haider,D. 1974 .When Governments Come to Washington: Governors, Mayors and Inter-
governmental Lobbying. New York: Free Press.
Jones,C.O. 1994 .The Presidency in a Separated System. Washington, DC: Brookings.
Kelemen,D.R. 2004 .The Rules of Federalism: Institutions and Regulatory Politics in the EU
and Beyond. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Kincaid,J. 1990. From cooperative to coercive federalism.Annals of the American Academy
of Political and Social Science, 509 : 139 – 52.
—— 1996. From dual to coercive federalism in American intergovernmental relations. Pp.
29 – 47 inGlobalization and Decentralization: Institutional Contexts, Policy Issues, and
Intergovernmental Relations in Japan and the United States, ed. J. S. Jun and D. S. Wright.
Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
—— 1998. The devolution tortoise and the centralization hare.New England Economic
Review, May/June: 13 – 40.
Krause, G. A. and Bowman, A. O’M. 2005. Adverse selection, political parties, and policy
delegation in the American federal system.Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization,
21 : 359 – 87.
Lee,F.E.andOppenheimer,B.I. 1999 .Sizing Up the Senate: The Unequal Consequences of
Equal Representation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Levine, P. and Zimmerman,D. 1999. An empirical analysis of the welfare magnet debate
using the NLSY.Journal of Population Economics, 12 : 391 – 409.
Lowry,W.R. 1992 .The Dimensions of Federalism: State Governments and Pollution Control
Policies. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
258 alberta m. sbragia