political science

(Wang) #1

Converse, P. E. and Pierce,R. 1986 .Political Representation in France. Cambridge, Mass.:
Cambridge University Press.
Cooper, J. and Brady,D.W. 1981. Institutional context and leadership style.American
Political Science Review, 75 : 411 – 25.
Cowley, P. and Norton,P. 1999. Rebels and rebellions: Conservative MPs in the 1992
parliament.British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 1 : 81 – 105.
Cox, G. W. and McCubbins,M.D. 1993 .Legislative Leviathan. Berkeley: University of
California Press.
Damgaard,E. 1995. How parties control committee members. Pp. 308 – 25 inParliaments
and Majority Rule in Western Europe, ed. H. Do ̈ring. Frankfurt: Campus Verlag.
—— 1997. The political roles of Danish MPs. Pp. 79 – 90 inMembers of Parliament
in Western Europe: Roles and Behavior, ed. W. C. Mu ̈ller and T. Saalfeld. London: Frank Cass.
Davidson,R. 1969 .The Role of the Congressman. New York: Pegasus.
Depauw,S. 1999. Parliamentary party cohesion and the scarcity of sanctions in the Belgian
Chamber of Representatives ( 1991 – 1995 ).Res Publica, 41 : 15 – 39.
Erikson,R.S. 1978. Constituency opinion and Congressional behavior: a reexamination of
the Miller–Stokes representation data.American Journal of Political Science, 22 : 511 – 35.
—— Wright, G. C., and MacIver,J.P. 1993 .Statehouse Democracy. New York: Cambridge
University Press.
Evans, C. L. and Oleszek,W. 1997 .Congress Under Fire. Boston: Houghton MiZin.
Farah,B.G. 1980. Political representation in West Germany. Ph.D. dissertation, University
of Michigan.
Fenno, R. F., Jr. 1973 .Congressmen in Committees. Boston: Little, Brown.
—— 1978 .Home Style. Boston: Little, Brown.
Fiorina,M.P. 1977 .Congress: Keystone of the Washington Establishment. New Haven, Conn.:
Yale University Press.
Gladdish,K. 1990. Parliamentary activism and legitimacy in the Netherlands. Pp. 103 – 19 in
Parliaments in Western Europe, ed. P. Norton. Portland, Oreg.: Frank Cass.
Heidar,K. 1997. Rules, structures and behavior: Norwegian parlamentarians in the nine-
ties. Pp. 91 – 109 inMembers of Parliament in Western Europe: Roles and Behavior, ed.
W. C. Mu ̈ller and T. Saalfeld. Portland, Oreg.: Frank Cass.
Herzog, D., Rebenstorf, H., and Weßels,B. 1990 ,Abgeordnete und Bu ̈vger.Opladen:
Westdeutscher Verlago.
Hix,S. 2004. Electoral institutions and legislative behavior: explaining voting defection in
the European Parliament.World Politics, 56 : 194 – 223.
Jacobson,G.C. 2004 .The Politics of Congressional Elections, 6 th edn. New York: Longman.
—— and Kernell,S. 1983. Strategy and Choice in Congressional Elections, 2 nd edn.
New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.
Kingdon,J.W. 1973 .Congressmen’s Voting Decisions. New York: Harper and Row.
Krehbiel,K. 1991 .Information and Legislative Organization. Ann Arbor: University of
Michigan Press.
—— 1993. Where’s the party?British Journal of Political Science, 23 : 235 – 66.
—— 1998 .Pivotal Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Lowell,A.L. 1901. The inXuence of party upon legislation in England and America.
Annual Report of the American Historical Association for 1901 , 1 : 319 – 542.
Matthews,D.R. 1960 .U.S. Senators and Their World. Chapel Hill: University of North
Carolina Press.


comparative legislative behavior 471
Free download pdf