Powell, G. B., Jr. 2000 .Elections as Instruments of Democracy: Majoritarian and Propor-
tional Visions. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.
Rae,D. 1971 .The Political Consequences of Electoral Laws. New Haven, Conn.: Yale Univer-
sity Press.
Remington, T. F. and Smith, S. S., 1996. Political goals, institutional context, and the
choice of an electoral system: the Russian parliamentary election law.American Journal of
Political Science, 40 : 1253 – 79.
Riker,W.H. 1982. The two-party system and Duverger’s law: an essay on the history of
political science.American Political Science Review, 76 : 753 – 66.
Sakamoto,T. 1999. Explaining electoral reform: Japan versus Italy and New Zealand.Party
Politics, 5 ( 4 ): 419 – 38.
Schattschneider,E.E. 1942 .Party Government. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press; repr.
1977.
Shugart, M. S. and Wattenberg, P. (eds.) 2003 .Mixed-Member Electoral Systems: The
Best of Both Worlds?Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Shvetsova,O. 2003. Endogenous selection of institutions and their exogenous eVects.
Constitutional Political Economy, 14 : 191 – 212.
Taagepera,R. 1997. The Tailor of Marrakesh: Western electoral systems advice to emerging
democracies. InElectoral Systems for Emerging Democracies, ed. J. Elklit. Copenhagen:
Danish Ministry of Foreign AVairs.
—— and Shugart,M. 1989 .Seats and Votes: The EVects and Determinants of Electoral
Systems. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.
Tsebelis,G. 1999. Nested Game: Rational Choice and Comparative Politics. Berkeley:
University of California Press.
Vowles,J. 1995. The politics of electoral reform in New Zealand.International Political
Science Review, 16 : 95 – 115.
—— Aimer, P., Karp, J., Banducci, S., Miller, R., and Sullivan,A. 2002 .Proportional
Representation on Trial: The 1999 Election in New Zealand and the Fate of MMP. Aotearoa:
Auckland University Press.
594 shaun bowler