Table 4.1 The ontological distinctiveness of constructivist institutionalism
Rational choiceinstitutionalism
Historicalinstitutionalism
Normative/sociologicalinstitutionalism
Constructivist institutionalism
Theoretical approach
Context-specifictheoreticalmodelling (wherepossible);qualified parsimony
To contextualizeagency bothhistorically andinstitutionally; tosensitize analyststo logics of pathdependence
To contextualizeagency culturally andinstitutionally; tosensitize analyststo logics of appropriateconduct withininstitutionalized settings
To sensitize the analystto key moments of changeand to the conditions ofexistence of complexinstitutional change
Theoretical assumptions
‘‘Calculus’’approach—actorsare instrumentallyrational
Actors display acombination of ‘‘cultural’’and ‘‘calculus’’ logics
‘‘Cultural’’ approach—actorsfollows normsand conventions
Actors are both strategicand socialized—they canbehave in a variety ofdifferent ways
Analytical approach
Deductive
Deductive–inductive
Deductive–inductive
Deductive–inductive
Method
Mathematicalmodeling(where possible)
Theoretically-informed;historical; narrative
Often statistical(thesis testing);sometimesnarrative
Theoretically-informed processtracing; discourseanalysis
Conception ofinstitutions
‘‘The rules of thegame in asociety’’ (North)
‘‘Formal and informalprocedures, routines,norms andconventions’’ (Hall)
Cultural conventions,norms, cognitiveframes
Institutions ascodified systems ofideas and thepractices they sustain
Institutionalchange
1 Focus on the(positive) functionsan institutionperforms
1 Focus on institutionalcreation as definingthe path downwhich subsequent
1 Focus oninstitutional creationas the diffusion ofa pre-existing
1 Focus on the sociallyconstructed nature ofpolitical opportunitystructures