Table 4.1 The ontological distinctiveness of constructivist institutionalism
Rational choiceinstitutionalismHistoricalinstitutionalismNormative/sociologicalinstitutionalismConstructivist institutionalismTheoretical approachContext-specifictheoreticalmodelling (wherepossible);qualified parsimonyTo contextualizeagency bothhistorically andinstitutionally; tosensitize analyststo logics of pathdependenceTo contextualizeagency culturally andinstitutionally; tosensitize analyststo logics of appropriateconduct withininstitutionalized settingsTo sensitize the analystto key moments of changeand to the conditions ofexistence of complexinstitutional changeTheoretical assumptions‘‘Calculus’’approach—actorsare instrumentallyrationalActors display acombination of ‘‘cultural’’and ‘‘calculus’’ logics‘‘Cultural’’ approach—actorsfollows normsand conventionsActors are both strategicand socialized—they canbehave in a variety ofdifferent waysAnalytical approachDeductiveDeductive–inductiveDeductive–inductiveDeductive–inductiveMethodMathematicalmodeling(where possible)Theoretically-informed;historical; narrativeOften statistical(thesis testing);sometimesnarrativeTheoretically-informed processtracing; discourseanalysisConception ofinstitutions‘‘The rules of thegame in asociety’’ (North)‘‘Formal and informalprocedures, routines,norms andconventions’’ (Hall)Cultural conventions,norms, cognitiveframesInstitutions ascodified systems ofideas and thepractices they sustainInstitutionalchange1 Focus on the(positive) functionsan institutionperforms1 Focus on institutionalcreation as definingthe path downwhich subsequent1 Focus oninstitutional creationas the diffusion ofa pre-existing1 Focus on the sociallyconstructed nature ofpolitical opportunitystructures