qualities that suited me. He was a man who, during five years of
boredom and depression, consoled, supported and encouraged me,
a man without whom, in a word, I would have died or become as
stupid as those around me. A friend of liberty and enlightenment,
this man’s high moral stance on ethics, politics and religion
corresponded exactly with my own in every detail.... Who can give
me back that intimacy, that complete conformity on matters of
principle, that immediate mutual understanding over our ideas,
which coincided, reinforcing and complementing one another? I
always left my friend’s house feeling more knowledgeable, more
lively and more active than when I went in. If I have retained any
love for literature, for truth, or for the research which is my only
consolation, then it is to him that I owe it. He is dead, and so many
dolts are alive! And that mind which was so brilliant and so
powerful, that heart which was courageous and free, and that
capacity for sustained hard work and patient reasoning, all of that is
gone! ...It is the first time death has robbed me of someone who
was really dear to me.
(Letter of 31 January 1794^9 )
On 17 March 1805 Constant was to note in his Journaux intimes that
eleven years later he had still not got over Mauvillon’s death,
10
and when
he wrote to Mauvillon’s eldest son on 18 January 1817 he told him: ‘I will
never forget my close friendship with your father, whose memory is linked
to my earliest literary and philosophical thoughts’.^11 The first meeting of
Constant and Mauvillon doubtless took place at the Große Klub, though
Mauvillon had a low opinion of the place: he had written to a friend in
1785,
what you will find unbelievable is that this club which has more
than 150 members, included all the intelligent and learned men in
Brunswick, offers gambling as the only amusement. The only
people who meet there are usually those who want to gamble.
Fortunately I quite like gambling, so that’s some consolation for
me.^12
As well as their taste for gambling, both men discovered that they had in
common a dislike for Brunswick, which Mauvillon found more ugly than
Kassel, for example, calling it ‘a large ugly town on a completely flat
plain’, and although its Court was welcoming to foreigners, the aristocracy
he found ‘extremely arrogant’.^13 What they cannot have failed to notice
Benjamin constant 112