multiple of the estimated standard deviation of the method, usually 95% or
±1.96s/N1/2;
● action linesare positioned to correspond to a selected probability level
or multiple of the estimated standard deviation of the method usually 99.7% or
±3.01s/N1/2;
● the pairs of warning lines will move inwards towards the target line as the
number of results per plotted point, N, increases, so the value of Nmust be
fixed before the chart is used;
● in the absence of determinate errors (bias), 95% of values should fall within
the upper and lower warning lines. The system is then considered to be
stable or under control;
● two or more consecutive values falling outside the warning lines but within
the action lines indicate a possible loss of control;
● two or more consecutive values falling outside the action lines indicate the
occurrence of one or more determinate errors; the system is then considered
to be out of control and remedial action should be taken;
● trends in plotted values are an indication of incipient problems, as are ten or
more consecutive values on one side of the target line.
The chart shows that the system is in control during the first 6 samples
analyzed, but the upper warning level has been breached by result 7. However,
the next 8 results are within the warning levels, but results 17 to 20 indicate a
downward trend culminating with both lower limits being breached indicating
a loss of control due to one or more determinate errors. At this point, the causes
should be sought and remedial action taken.
The principal purpose of collaborative testingis to assess the accuracy of
results from a group of laboratories performing one or more specific quantita-
tive determinations. Interlaboratory studies are also used to assess other perfor-
mance characteristics of a particular method or the competence of individual
analysts in relation to a specified technique, analyte or group of analytes. They
are frequently used by trade associations, standards organizations or agencies
Collaborative
testing
Sample number
Mass or concentration
of analyte, x
3s/N1/2
2s/N1/2
x
2s/N1/2
3s/N1/2
0 5 10 15 20
Fig. 1. A Shewart averages control chart.
50 Section B – Assessment of data