304 Notes to pages 198–215
- Williams 1971 , 175.
- Ibid. , 176.
- Cited in Bowers 2001 , 7.
- Wheatstone 1879 , 1 – 12; see also Bowers 2001 , 15 – 31.
- Wheatstone 1879 , 5. For the meeting with Ø rsted, see Christensen 2013, 212.
- Ibid. , 8.
- Ibid. , 21 – 29.
- Ibid. , 21.
- Ibid. , 36 – 46.
- Faraday 1991 , 1:448.
- Wheatstone 1879 , 42; emphasis in the original.
- Ibid., 44.
- Proceedings of the Royal Institution 1829.
- Williams 1971 , 177.
- Bowers 2001 , 35 – 41, at 37; Atlas 1996 , 28 – 34; Chladni 1821.
- As per his 1834 account, Wheatstone 1879 , 84 – 96, at 84; see also Bowers 2001 , 57 – 68; Canales 2009 , 138,
151, 159. - Wheatstone 1879 , 58 – 59.
- Williams 1971 , 178.
- Ibid., 179.
- Faraday 1932 , 329 – 359; see also Faraday 1831.
- Faraday 1831 , 309. See the helpful discussion in Tweney 1992a,b.
- Ibid. , 336.
- Faraday 1991 , 1:556 – 557.
- Faraday 1831 , 337 – 338. See also Coleridge ’ s poem “ The Eolian Harp ” (1795) and Abrahms 1957 ; Bidney
- Faraday 1831 , 328.
- Faraday 1932 , 1:353.
- Ibid., 1:358 – 359.
- Faraday 1965 , 1:3.
- Faraday 1932 , 1:368; 1965 , 1:4.
- Faraday 1965 , 1:16, 18, 19.
- From a manuscript in the Royal Institution included in Williams 1971 , 181, which notes the analogy between
sound and electricity, as does Hirshfeld 2006 , 117 – 118. - See Hubbard 1968 , 27 – 67; Bowers 2001 , 117 – 138.
- Tyndall 1961 , 149.
- Wheatstone 1879 , 138 – 140, at 138.
- For this development, see Galison 2003 , which mentions Wheatstone on 30.
- Wheatstone 1879 , 141 – 142.
- Ibid. , 143 – 151.
- On the different values for this speed, see Faraday 1965 , 3:515 – 516, 575 – 579.
- Though Faraday was well aware of Young ’ s work, he shows no awareness of the private letter in which
Young had recorded his misgivings about the ether. - Faraday 1965 , 3:449 – 451, 161 – 168.