Mortgage servicer responsibilities
In the typical MRB structure, mortgage servicers
are required only to remit mortgage revenues to the
extent that they are collected. If a mortgagor’s pay-
ment remains delinquent, the servicer is required to
undertake further steps to collect. The servicer also
must apply for advance claims payments under the
appropriate insurance policy or proceed toward
foreclosure if applicable.
Standard & Poor’s reviews the track record of
each servicer as it pertains to originations, delin-
quencies, foreclosures, insurance claims processing,
and claims denials upon the rating of a new resolu-
tion. Generally major servicers have sound proce-
dures to track loans and process claims. Servicers
with negative track records in one or more of these
areas may be requested not to participate in the
program, although this is uncommon.
FDIC regulations concerning the payment of
insurance benefits limit the $100,000 FDIC benefit
on a mortgage servicing account to $100,000 per
investor, rather than $100,000 per account. This
has an impact on all single-family, whole-loan
deals. If an investor has an interest in one or more
servicing accounts or has another account at the
servicing institution, then all of these accounts
would be aggregated in calculating the insurance
benefit for that investor. Standard & Poor’s cannot
be assured that immediate remittance to the trustee
of amounts in excess of $100,000 will still leave the
servicing account whole in the event of a servicer
failure. This concern needs to be addressed by the
issuer on all single-family, whole-loan financings.
Cash flow administration
Operation of an MRB issue’s cash flow depends on
adequate cash flow administration. This function
includes executing investment transactions and
investment agreements, managing cash to maximize
interest income, and identifying prepayments and
appropriate bonds to be called from prepayments.
This function should be carried out by the agency
or capable third party overseen by the issuer.■
Single-Family Second Mortgage Loans ............................................................................
http://www.standardandpoors.com 243
B
onds secured by second mortgage loans origi-
nated to low-and moderate-income persons are
eligible to receive ratings as high as ‘AAA’, depend-
ing on the credit supports and levels of over-collat-
eralization used to back the bonds. Rated second
mortgage bonds typically would be used for down
payment assistance and closing costs as opposed to
cash out mortgages for consumer purposes. Bonds
backed by second mortgages need higher loan loss
coverage than first mortgages because of the higher
probability of foreclosure and the lack of recover-
able assets in the event of foreclosure. For example,
loan loss coverage for second mortgage bonds rated
at the ‘A’ rating level would start at 25% and could
climb beyond 48%, depending on characteristics of
the loans and other factors.
Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services will apply the
same standards when determining loan loss cover-
age for second mortgages whether rating programs
supported by only second mortgages or programs
with first and second mortgage collateral. The eval-
uation is derived from Standard & Poor’s first
mortgage criteria and includes:
■Credit characteristics of the mortgage loan pool;
■Reserve funding;
■Bond and legal structure; and
■Cash flow sufficiency.
Credit Characteristics
The higher credit coverage for second loan bonds
results from key elements that increase the risk of fore-
closure of second mortgages, including the following:
The subordinate nature of
the second mortgage pledge
Second mortgage lenders have a subordinate lien on
the assets pledged for repayment of the first and
second mortgages. Default on the second mortgage
does not affect payment of the first mortgage,
whereas default or foreclosure on the first mortgage
results in the same on the second mortgage. In the
event of foreclosure, the order of priority requires
that any proceeds generated from a sale go first to
the first mortgage lender. This could leave the hold-
er of the second mortgage with no funds for recov-
ery, resulting in a loss severity of 100%.
Furthermore, payment interruption on the first
mortgage must be remedied before payment can go
toward the second mortgage.