30 Friday March 18 2022 | the times
Letters to the Editor
Letters to the Editor should be sent to
[email protected] or by post to
1 London Bridge Street, London SE1 9GF
the sense of victimhood and paranoia
that seems evident among its leaders.
The best hope for ending the conflict
will be through Russian citizens being
denied the attractions of the free
world. We should, however, be
extremely cautious in exercising
sanctions against individuals and
wary of compromising the rule of law.
Whatever one may feel about the
moral questions arising from how the
oligarchs acquired their wealth, the
vast majority have been found guilty
of no criminal offences either here or
in Russia. Once any state acts against
people based on a moral as opposed
to a legal position regarding how that
wealth was acquired, there is no limit
to who may be thought to have
offended society and face the
sequestration of their assets. Action
against resident aliens may be
acceptable during wartime but no
such state exists between Britain and
Russia at present, and long may that
remain the case.
Anthony Browne
Datchet, Berks
Sir, President Putin appears to have
taken grave offence at the charge of
being called a war criminal by
President Biden (“ ‘Hundreds trapped’
climate change APPG; Ben Lake MP,
chairman, fuel poverty and energy
efficiency APPG; Baroness Parminter,
chairwoman, environment and
climate change committee; Baroness
Hayman, co-chairwoman, Peers for
the Planet; Ian Liddell-Grainger MP,
chairman, energy studies APPG;
Kerry McCarthy MP, chairwoman,
small island developing states APPG;
Philip Dunne MP; chairman,
environmental audit committee
Sir, Alice Thomson does not explain
how we obtain electricity when the
wind does not blow and the sun does
not shine (“Suddenly, we’ve all
warmed to green energy”, Mar 16, and
letters, Mar 17). Our energy bills have
soared because we have duplicate
energy systems — one for when it is
windy and another, powered mostly
by gas, when it is not. This country
could have plentiful supplies of cheap
shale gas if the government would lift
the moratorium on fracking. Instead
we choose to fund President Putin’s
war by buying gas from Russia.
David Stark
Cumbernauld, North Lanarkshire
after strike on theatre”, news, Mar 17).
No doubt he would also object to
being no-platformed or cancelled.
One wonders why he cares. The
evidence might suggest that he has no
interest in complying with
international law or in upholding
humanitarian norms. His whole
point, surely, is that he regards
western concepts of freedom,
individual rights and the rule of law
as outmoded and decadent, and
above all inapplicable to him. But
then autocrats are not known for
their sense of irony.
Richard Millett QC
London NW1
Sir, Helen Hanson (letter, Mar 16)
opposes the monthly £350 to be paid
by the government to households
accommodating Ukrainian refugees.
She argues, cogently, that the
payment should be a charitable
gesture to support the desperate
needs of these refugees. Any recipient
who agrees with her can pass the
money on to a suitable charity and, if
a taxpayer, make a gift aid
declaration, thereby converting the
£350 to £437.50 for the charity.
Anthony Rentoul
Twickenham
Freeing Nazanin
Sir, I am delighted that we have at last
repaid the long overdue debt owed
to Iran that has allowed Nazanin
Zaghari-Ratcliffe and Anoosheh
Ashoori to return home (reports,
Mar 17). However, Britain has an
even larger debt dating back almost
700 years: the money borrowed by
Edward III from banking families in
Florence to finance the English in
the Hundred Years War. These loans
amounted to 900,000 gold florins
from the Bardis and 600,000 florins
from the Peruzzis. Although Edward
made some repayments in cash,
wool and other items, the debt is still
outstanding. Partly as a consequence
of this, both families went bust
shortly after making the loans.
Brenda Hunt
Salisbury
Sir, We seem to bestow honours now
to “celebrities” and political figures
who neither need nor deserve them.
I would suggest that Nazanin
Zaghari-Ratcliffe and her husband
be given awards, hers for bravery
and his for persistence in the face of
government delay and incompetence.
It would be small recompense for six
lost years but a recognition of the
esteem and affection in which the
people of this country hold them.
Roger Baker
Strensall, N Yorks
Bursting with flair
Sir, In your leading article (“Suits You,
Sir”, Mar 15) you lament the demise
of men’s suits. Having spent my
entire life in the production of men’s
tailoring, may I point out another
possible cause: the trend to create the
“burst tomato” look, suits so tight as
to be uncomfortable. The tailored suit
has always been an absurd item but
the effort from so many skilled people
to produce a tailored look that is also
good to wear has been trashed in the
latest fashion. If there is a way back
for tailored garments, comfort has to
be considered.
James Roberts
Ret’d designer for Pierre Cardin;
Ashdon, Essex
Shipwreck survivor
Sir, Cat lovers upset by Shackleton’s
murder of Mrs Chippy (letters,
Mar 14, 16 & 17) may be heartened by
the story of Nigeraurak, ship’s cat on
the Karluk, Vilhjalmur Stefansson’s
ship in his 1913 Arctic expedition,
which suffered a similar fate to the
Endurance. She was kept alive and
safe with the survivors of the wreck.
When they were finally rescued six
years later she was found to be fatter
and fitter than before, as all the
sailors who cared about cats had
shared their meagre rations with her.
Ralph Lloyd-Jones
Nottingham
World wide wonder
Sir, Paul Saunders writes of using
Whitaker’s almanac to discover
“unknown unknowns” (letter, Mar 17).
Such serendipity works when using
computers, too. I was recently
researching for a quiz and through
googling Betjeman’s Summoned by
Bells to check a source, I came across
a delightful programme of Betjeman
reading from that autobiographical
poem on BBC iPlayer. I was entranced
to hear his voice again and saw some
wonderful images, including the
local place mentioned in my quiz.
Ruth Wright
Longborough, Glos
Corrections and
clarifications
The Times takes
complaints
about editorial
content seriously. We are committed to
abiding by the Independent Press
Standards Organisation (“IPSO”) rules
and regulations and the Editors’ Code of
Practice that IPSO enforces.
Requests for corrections or
clarifications should be sent by email to
[email protected] or by post to
Feedback, The Times, 1 London Bridge
Street, London SE1 9GF
Festival of Brexit
Sir, It is difficult to see how an
informed or accurate assessment of
the Unboxed festival could be made
by the Commons culture, media and
sport committee since evidence was
heard before the ten projects had
been announced and any activity
had taken place (“Brexit festival ‘a
vague waste of £120m’ ”, Mar 16).
Throughout the pandemic,
Unboxed has created jobs and
facilitated new partnerships across
science, technology, engineering,
arts and maths, developing hundreds
of events and activities for the public
to experience, and working with
the local communities that will host
them across the UK.
The committee may wish to speak
to the 50,000 ecstatic people who
saw our opening event, called
About Us, in Paisley a couple
of weeks ago. They may also wish to
visit our varied programme that runs
throughout this year and see for
themselves what truly new
approaches to creativity can achieve.
Martin Green
Chief creative officer, Unboxed
Dame Vikki Heywood
Chairwoman, Unboxed
Waning of US power and the rise of oligarchs
Sir, Iain Martin’s tribute to Harry
Truman as one of the great postwar
American presidents is well deserved
(“America’s lost its knack for great
leadership”, Mar 17). As a child in
England I remember hearing and
reading of the “Truman Doctrine”, as
a great American ally emerged from
its prewar isolationism. Together with
Dean Acheson, Truman, with
unprecedented benevolence, helped
to repair the wartime ravages of a
Europe then facing an existentialist
communist threat. Later research
confirmed that initial impression of
truly great leadership: a mixture of
brave military service, readiness to
bear responsibility (“The buck stops
here” being his famed motto) for
decisions conveyed with succinct
clarity, and all garnished with a
humbleness rarely found at such
level. Apart from Ukraine’s valiant
president, such qualities seem sadly
lacking in today’s world leaders.
John Kidd
Surfers Paradise, Queensland
Sir, As Daniel Finkelstein writes
(comment, Mar 16; letters, Mar 17), it
was right for Britain to engage with
the oligarchs as failing to do so would
have isolated Russia and increased
How to wean Britain off Russian gas
Sir, As a cross-party group of
parliamentarians with an interest in
energy and the environment we
support robust plans to reduce the
country’s dependence on gas. With
gas prices quadrupling in a year and
now the war in Ukraine, the prime
minister’s forthcoming energy plan
represents a critical moment for
the UK to take the steps required to
achieve this. Russia is the largest
exporter of gas in the world and we
cannot realistically expect to affect
the market price, so we need to
address demand as well as supply.
The simplest solution is to use less
gas. Through better energy efficiency
such as insulation, switching to
electric heat pumps for homes, and by
expanding cheap domestic renewables
for power generation we can quickly
insulate ourselves from this gas crisis
and bring down our energy bills, both
now and for the future.
Anthony Browne MP, chairman,
all-party parliamentary group
(APPG) on the environment; Darren
Jones MP, chairman, business energy
and industrial strategy committee;
Caroline Lucas MP, chairwoman,
from the times march 18, 1922
THE RITUAL
OF WINE
DRINKING
Anglophobia
Sir, Perhaps Moray council
(“Islamophobia? Anglophobia is a
bigger issue, say Scots councillors”,
Mar 17) should have been put in
charge of the Scottish census, due to
be completed by March 20. The
question on nationality displays a
distinct anti-English bias, with
options including Scottish, Irish and
Polish but not English (or Welsh). I
am mortified that the many English
people I know must choose “Other
British” to describe their nationality
and hope they know that not all Scots
are so unwelcoming.
Jeanette Stafford
Bearsden, East Dunbartonshire
thetimes.co.uk/archive
Fine figures
Sir, Steven Hogg does himself and
“Ms Perfectly Boring” an injustice
(letter, Mar 17). I have met two
forensic accountants, both of whom
told me tales of fraud, corruption and
heroic feats of incompetence that
made my hair stand on end.
Bruce Hunt
Linton, Cambs
Successful silks
Sir, I was pleased to read Catherine
Baksi’s article about the QC selection
process (“Passage to taking silk is
‘fatally flawed’ ”, Law, Mar 17). Many
of the points she makes are well
known in the profession. A wise
counsel told me many years ago
that the best litigator (barrister or
solicitor) is the one who can keep
their clients out of court. This can be
achieved by giving sound advice so
that a matter never leads to a dispute
or advice to reach a satisfactory
settlement where a dispute is
involved. Both types of advice have
become increasingly important in
an international context, where the
role of trusted adviser has grown.
The Bar is well placed to perform
this role without compromising
independence. Indeed, the quality of
the individual’s independence makes
this particularly valued by those who
instruct barristers. The irony is that a
barrister whose practice is geared to
providing this counsel successfully
can never be a Queen’s Counsel under
the present system.
Nikhil Mehta
Gray’s Inn Tax Chambers, London
Letters to The Times must be exclusive
and may be edited. Please include a full
address and daytime telephone number.
The poets and writers who have
been celebrating the glories of
French wine this week have had
science come to their aid at today’s
meeting of the National Congress.
Dr Louis Mathieu, Professor of the
Faculty of Science at Bordeaux, has
explained scientifically the subtle art
of testing good wine — the “psycho-
physiology”. There are three factors
to be considered — the wine, the
taster, and the circumstances around
him. For the wine there are colour,
clearness, bouquet. The taster’s
capacity of appreciation depends
upon his ancestry, age, sex, health,
education and mood. The variation
of sensation produced by a particular
wine upon all these factors in the
tester is, declares Dr Mathieu, a
mere matter of mathematics to be
reduced to a table of formulae. But
his science changes to lyricism when
he considers scientifically how wines
should be drunk at dinner. The
principle is to have a crescendo of
effect upon one’s sensory apparatus.
The stronger wines should be kept
till the last — first, because weaker
wines seem even weaker after strong
ones and, secondly, because as the
dinner progresses one’s sensibility
diminishes. It would, therefore, be
heresy to drink port after soup, as
that would kill all the wines that
followed. It would also be an error to
end a meal with dry champagne.
But, Dr Mathieu complains, no one
any longer knows how to drink or to
eat. According to him, the proper
order of wines at dinner should be
Chablis or Pouilly with oysters and
fish; with the entree, Beaujolais, light
Burgundy, or Bordeaux; with the
roast, and above all with game, the
grands crus, a chateau wine, a
Vougeot or a Chambertin. With
roast veal Beaune or Pommard
should be drunk, or, perhaps, dry
champagne. Champagne, sweet or
demi-sec, should be taken with
dessert, and before coffee a glass of
port in the English fashion.
Afterwards cognac or Armagnac.
And, of course, you cannot
appreciate the savours of these wines
unless you are deliberate and elegant
in your tasting. The room the table,
the company, the shape and quality
of glasses, make a difference and
also, though Dr Mathieu does not
mention it, the sound of the names.
Could any liquid named Margaux,
Latour, Chambertin, or Clos du Roi
taste wholly ill?