Cognitive Psychology: Connecting Mind, Research and Everyday Experience, 3rd Edition

(Tina Meador) #1

CHAPTER SUMMARY


CHAPTER SUMMARY



  1. Memory is the process involved in retaining, retriev-
    ing, and using information about stimuli, images,
    events, ideas, and skills after the original information
    is no longer present. It is important for dealing with
    day-to-day events, and cases such as Clive Wearing’s
    illustrate the importance of memory for normal
    functioning.

  2. Atkinson and Shiffrin’s modal model of memory consists
    of three structural features—sensory memory, short-term
    memory, and long-term memory. Another feature of the
    model is control process such as rehearsal and atten-
    tional strategies.

  3. Sperling used two methods, whole report and partial
    report, to determine the capacity and time course of
    visual sensory memory. The duration of visual sensory
    memory (iconic memory) is less than 1 second, and of
    auditory sensory memory (echoic memory) about 2–4
    seconds.

  4. Short-term memory is our window on the present.
    Brown, and Peterson and Peterson, determined that the
    duration of STM is about 15–20 seconds. They inter-
    preted the short duration of STM as being caused by
    decay, but a later reanalysis of their data indicated it was
    due to proactive interference.

  5. According to George Miller’s classic seven plus or
    minus two paper, the capacity of STM is 5 to 9 items.
    According to more recent experiments, the capacity is
    about 4 items. The amount of information held in STM
    can be expanded by chunking—combining small units
    into larger, more meaningful ones. Examples of chunking
    are the memory performance of the runner S.F. and how
    chess masters use their knowledge of chess to remember
    chess piece positions.

  6. Information can be coded in STM in terms of sound
    (auditory coding), vision (visual coding), and meaning
    (semantic coding). Auditory coding was illustrated by
    Conrad’s experiment that analyzed the type of errors
    made in memory for letters. Visual coding was illustrated
    by Della Sala’s recalling visual patterns experiment, and
    semantic coding by Wickens’ release from proactive
    interference experiment.

  7. The short-term memory component of the modal model
    was revised by Baddeley to deal with results that couldn’t
    be explained by a single short-term process. In this new
    model, working memory replaces STM.

  8. Working memory is a limited-capacity system for stor-
    age and manipulation of information in complex tasks.


It consists of three components: the phonological loop,
which holds auditory or verbal information; the visuo-
spatial sketch pad, which holds visual and spatial infor-
mation; and the central executive, which coordinates
the action of the phonological loop and visuospatial
sketch pad.


  1. The following effects can be explained in terms of opera-
    tion of the phonological loop: (a) phonological similar-
    ity effect; (b) word length effect; and (c) articulatory
    suppression.

  2. Shepard and Metzler’s mental rotation experiment illus-
    trates visual imagery, which is one of the functions of
    the visuospatial sketch pad. Brooks’s “F” experiment
    showed that two tasks can be handled simultaneously if
    one involves the visuospatial sketch pad and the other
    involves the phonological loop. Performance decreases if
    one component of working memory is called on to deal
    with two tasks simultaneously.

  3. The central executive coordinates how information is
    used by the phonological loop and visuospatial sketch
    pad, and can therefore be thought of as an attention con-
    troller. Patients with frontal lobe damage have trouble
    controlling their attention, as illustrated by the phenom-
    enon of perseveration.

  4. The working memory model has been updated to
    include an additional component called the episodic buf-
    fer, which helps connect working memory with LTM
    and which has a greater capacity and can hold informa-
    tion longer than the phonological loop or visuospatial
    sketch pad.

  5. Behaviors that depend on working memory can be dis-
    rupted by damage to the prefrontal cortex. This has
    been demonstrated by testing monkeys on the delayed-
    response task.

  6. There are neurons in the prefrontal cortex that fire to
    presentation of a stimulus and continue firing as this
    stimulus is held in memory.

  7. Brain imaging experiments in humans reveal that a large
    number of brain areas are involved in working memory.
    Event-related potential (ERP) studies have provided
    physiological evidence supporting the idea that a more
    efficient working memory is associated with the ability
    to focus on relevant information and filter out irrelevant
    information.

  8. There is a great deal of evidence that having a larger or
    more efficient working memory is associated with better
    comprehension, reasoning ability, and intelligence.


Copyright 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part.
Free download pdf