References • 421MacDonald, M. C., Pearlmutter, N. J., &
Seidenberg, M. S. (1994). Lexical nature
of syntactic ambiguity resolution.
Psychological Review, 101, 676–703.
Mack, A., & Rock, I. (1998). Inattentional
blindness. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
MacKay, D. G. (1973). Aspects of the
theory of comprehension, memory and
attention. Quarterly Journal of
Experimental Psychology, 25, 22–40.
Mahon, B. Z., & Caramazza, A. (2009).
Concepts and categories: A cognitive
neuropsychological perspective. Annual
Review of Psychology, 60, 27–51.
Maier, N. R. F. (1931). Reasoning in humans:
II. The solution of a problem and its
appearance in consciousness. Journal of
Comparative Psychology, 12, 181–194.
Majid, A., Bowerman, M., Kita, S.,
Haun, D. B. M., & Levinson, S. C.
(2004). Can language restructure
cognition? The case of space. Trends in
Cognitive Sciences, 8(3), 108–114.
Malpass, R. S., & Devine, P. G. (1981).
Eyewitness identification: Lineup
instructions and absence of the offender.
Journal of Applied Psychology, 66,
482–489.
Malt, B. C. (1989). An on-line investigation
of prototype and exemplar strategies in
classification. Journal of Experimental
Psychology: Learning, Memory and
Cognition, 4, 539–555.
Manktelow, K. I. (1999). Reasoning and
thinking. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
Manktelow, K. I., & Evans, J. St. B. T.
(1979). Facilitation of reasoning by real-
ism: Effect or non-effect? British Journal
of Psychology, 70, 477–488.
Manktelow, K. I., & Over, D. E. (1990).
Deontic thought and the selection task.
In K. J. Gilhooly, M. T. G. Keane,
R. H. Logie, & G. Erdos (Eds.), Lines
of thinking: Reflections on the
psychology of thought (Vol. 1).
Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Mantyla, T. (1986). Optimizing cue
effectiveness: Recall of 500 and 600
incidentally learned words. Journal of
Experimental Psychology: Learning
Memory, and Cognition, 12, 66–71.
Marino, A. C., & Scholl, B. (2005). The
role of closure in defining the “objects”
of object-based attention. Perception &
Psychophysics, 67, 1140–1149.
Marsh, R., Cook, G., & Hicks, J. (2006).
Gender and orientation stereotypes bias
source- monitoring attributions.
Memory, 14, 148–160.
Martin, A. (2007). The representation of
object concepts in the brain. Annual
Review of Psychology, 58, 25–45.Mast, F. W., & Kosslyn, S. (2002). Visual
mental images can be ambiguous:
Insights from individual differences in
spatial transformation abilities.
Cognition, 86, 57–70.
McAdams, C. J., & Reid, R. C. (2005).
Attention modulates the responses of
simple cells in monkey primary visual
cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 25,
11023–11033.
McCarthy, J., Minsky, M. L., & Shannon,
C. E. (1955). A proposal for the
Dartmouth summer research project on
artificial intelligence. Downloaded from
http://www-formal.stanford.edu/jmc/
history/dartmouth/dartmouth.html
McClelland, J. L., McNaughton, B. L., &
O’Reilly, R.C. (1995). Why there are
complementary learning systems in the
hippocampus and neocortex: Insights
from the successes and failures of
connectionist models of learning and
memory. Psychological Review, 102,
419–457.
McClelland, J. L., & Rogers, T. T. (2003).
The parallel-distributed processing
approach to semantic cognition. Nature
Reviews Neuroscience, 4, 310–322.
McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E.
(1986). Parallel distributed processing:
Explorations in the microstructure of
cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
McDaniel, M. A., Anderson, J. L.,
Derbish, M. H., & Morrisette, N.
(2007). Testing the testing effect in the
classroom. European Journal of
Cognitive Psychology, 19, 494–513.
McDermott, K. B., & Chan, J. C. K. (2006).
Effects of repetition on memory for
pragmatic inferences. Memory &
Cognition, 34, 1273–1284.
McKelvie, S. L. (1997). The availability
heuristic: Effects of fame and gender on
the estimated frequency of male and
female names. Journal of Social
Psychology, 137, 63–78.
McNab, F., & Klingberg, T. (2008).
Prefrontal cortex and basal ganglia
control access to working memory.
Nature Neuroscience, 11, 103–107.
Mervis, C. B., Catlin, J., & Rosch, E.
(1976). Relationships among goodness-
of-example, category norms and word
frequency. Bulletin of the Psychonomic
Society, 7, 268–284.
Metcalfe, J., & Wiebe, D. (1987). Intuition
in insight and noninsight problem
solving. Memory and Cognition, 15,
238–246.
Meyer, D. E., & Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1971).
Facilitation in recognizing pairs of
words: Evidence of a dependencebetween retrieval operations. Journal
of Experimental Psychology, 90,
227–234.
Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number
seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on
our capacity for processing information.
Psychological Review, 63, 81–97.
Miller, G. A. (1965). Some preliminaries to
psycholinguistics. American Psycho-
logist, 20, 15–20.
Miller, G. A. (2003). The cognitive revolution:
A historical perspective. Trends in
Cognitive Sciences, 7, 141–144.
Milner, A. D., & Goodale, M. A. (1995).
The visual brain in action. New York:
Oxford University Press.
Minda, J. P., & Smith, J. D. (2001).
Prototypes in category learning: The
effect of category size, category
structure, and stimulus complexity.
Journal of Experimental Psychology:
Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27,
775–799.
Mishkin, M., Ungerleider, L. G., &
Macko, K. A. (1983). Object vision
and spatial vision: Two central path-
ways. Trends in Neuroscience, 6,
414–417.
Misiak, H., & Sexton, V. (1966). History of
psychology: An overview. New York:
Grune & Stratton.
Mitchell, K. J., & Johnson, M. K. (2000).
Source monitoring. In E. Tulving &
F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), The Oxford
handbook of memory (pp. 179–195).
New York: Oxford University Press.
Moran, J., & Desimone, R. (1985).
Selective attention gates visual
processing in the extrastriate cortex.
Science, 229, 782–784.
Moray, N. (1959). Attention in dichotic
listening: Affective cues and the
influence of instructions. Quarterly
Journal of Experimental Psychology, 11,
56–60.
Morris, C. D., Bransford, J. D., & Franks, J. J.
(1977). Levels of processing versus trans-
fer appropriate processing. Journal of
Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16,
519–533.
Morris, R. G., Miotto, E. C., Feigenbaum,
J. D., Bullock, P., & Polkey, C. E. (1997).
Planning ability after frontal and
temporal lobe lesions in humans: The
effects of selection equivocation and
working memory load. Cognitive
Neuropsychology, 14, 1007–1027.
Moscovitch, M., Rosenbaum, R. S.,
Gilboa, A., Addis, D. R., Westmacott, R.,
Grady, C., et al. (2005). Functional
neuroanatomy of remote episodic,
semantic and spatial memory: A unified33559_15_reference_p411-428.indd 42133559_15_reference_p411-428.indd 421 13/04/10 5:46 PM13/04/10 5:46 PM
Copyright 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part.