romthe4-billion-year-old,
230-kilometre(143-mile)wideClavius
impactcratertoNeilArmstrong’s
50-year-old,size-nine-and-a-half‘one
smallstep’,theMoonhasrecordedmomentous
episodesacrossmuchofourSolarSystem’shistory.
Forscientistsitssurfaceprovidesa 4-billion-year-
oldastronomicalarchiveofeventsthatshapedboth
itsownpepperedsurfaceandourplanettoo.A
passiveobserver,itsrecord-keepingvalueliesinthe
factthatthingstendtohappentoit,ratherthanit
showingsignsofitsownactivity.
Andyetitseemswemighthavemissed
something.Somethingsmallinsizebutlargerin
significance.Locatedrightbetweentheeyesofthe
‘ManintheMoon’,somescientistsbelievetheyhave
foundevidencethatlunarvolcanoeswereerupting
whendinosaursroamedtheEarth– andperhaps
theyarestilleruptingsomewhereonthesurface
rightnow.Ifconfirmedsuchactivitywouldtearup
currentmodelsoftheMoon’sinternalstructureand
howitevolved,aswellasrewritingassumptions
aboutothersupposedly‘lifeless’worldsbeyond.As
missionsareproposedtovisitthisintriguingsite,
weask,istheMoonstillalive?
Aquickglanceofitsancient,batteredsurface
offerslittlehope.TheMoon’scrateredappearance
isinstarkcontrasttonotonlytheplanetitorbits,
F
but also many local, smooth-surfaced planets, dwarf
planets and moons. In each case the main concealer
of these impact blemishes is volcanism. This
recycling of surface crust is familiar to us on Earth,
but also accounts for the lack of cratering on Venus,
Jupiter’s moon Io and even further out to Pluto.
But no such rejuvenation appears to have played
out on the lunar surface for a while. While the
large, dark mares covered some of the most ancient
cratered crust with wide-scale eruptions, billions of
years of exposure to Solar System violence has left
them sporting plenty of blemishes of their own. The
concentration of such cratering dates the mares to
between 3 and 4 billion years old, figures backed
up by analysis of recovered lunar rock samples.
And after that? Well, not much. “We thought that
volcanism had ended by 1 billion years ago,” says
Julie Stopar, a director at the Lunar and Planetary
Institute in Houston.
This made sense. The Moon, as a relatively small
body, shouldn't have ever had huge amounts of
internal heat. And what it had should have been lost
quickly due to the large surface area to mass ratio
that blights smaller worlds.
This heat might have another effect. Evidence
from thrust faults shows the lunar surface shrunk
as it cooled, contracting the crust up against itself.
This makes it even more difficult to imagine
volcanic activity piercing through. But then came a
photograph that put that all in doubt.
In 1971, while Apollo 15 astronauts David
Scott and James Irwin test-drove the first rover on
the lunar surface, Command Module pilot Alfred
Worden, orbiting above, took a picture of a strange
blotchy feature. Named Ina, it was an exposure
of a dynamic landscape – by lunar standards
anyway. The Moon’s surface is a collection of
homogeneously f lat vistas covered by broken-up
rock and dusty regolith. It's a landscape bombarded
into uniform consistency, where any notable
topography has been eroded through landslides and
impacts over vast eons of time.
“ It is hard to explain how you can have
young volcanism based on everything we
know about the Moon” JulieSStoppar
Right
(clockw ise):
In 1971, while
Apollo 15
astronauts David
Scott and James
Irwin test-drove
the first lunar
rover, Alfred
Worden , orbiting
above, took the
first pictures
of Ina
As the most
volcanically
active body
in the Solar
System, Jupiter’s
moon Io has
a very young,
uncratered
surface
Thrust up lunar
cliffs is evidence
of the Moon’s
contraction as
it cooled. Some
have questioned
where such
compression
forces would
allow lava to
reach the surface
All photos © NASA
The Moon is alive