The Sunday Times - UK (2022-04-10)

(Antfer) #1

The Sunday Times April 10, 2022 13


MONEY


Inflation fears prompt £2.4bn bond sell-off


We’re backing Britain... why it


could pay to show home bias


worse than the student carpetbaggers of
a generation ago?
The FCA has warned that consumers
should be prepared to lose all of their
money if they invest in digital currencies
such as bitcoin.
The arguments against crypto sound
much the same as many other popular
shares: their value is based on sentiment
in the market, there are no fundamentals
and no consumer protection. Some
argue that you should not back it because
it is hard to trace, so criminals use it to
launder the proceeds of crime. Crypto
enthusiasts always respond that cash has
the same problem.
So why are so many young people still
determined to put their limited savings
into cryptocurrencies if they could theo-
retically lose it all?
In a way, what they are doing is per-

house prices are still rising at record
rates. Last month Nationwide reported
that average prices had risen £33,000 in a
year. Even if you assume that you need to
come up with only a 10 per cent deposit,
that is an extra £275 a month young sav-
ers have to find just to keep pace with the
housing market.
Is it any wonder, when faced with buy-
ing a property in a market where the aver-
age house deposit is nearly £54,000, that
younger investors opt for a moonshot
investment in cryptocurrency rather
than a more conventional one that feels
impossible? Why wouldn’t they bring the
keeper into the opposition’s box?
Younger investors are bound to be
enticed by the riskier option when cer-
tain cryptocurrencies have risen 500 per
cent in the past 12 months. Bitcoin is up
3,604 per cent in five years.

It is not crazy for young people to invest


in crypto — it’s actually perfectly sane


Imogen Tew Modern Money


fectly logical. Confronted by inflated
share values, house prices that continue
to soar and savings rates that are ravaged
by inflation, young investors have been
forced to look for alternative ways to
make their money work for them.
They are having a natural response to
the craziness of other asset prices.
It is a high-stakes gamble, but one
where they feel they have little to lose.
Like finding a tenner and putting it on a
horse or bringing your goalkeeper up for
a corner in the dying seconds of a football
match that you’re losing.
Behind the desperation for good
returns is the fact that the overarching
goal of many young people — saving for a
house deposit — is getting further and
further out of reach.
It takes first-time buyers eight years on
average to build up their deposit, and UK

Burgeman from Brewin
Dolphin, the wealth manager,
picked Mercantile
Investment Trust, up
40.8 per cent over five years
and Liontrust Special
Situations, up 43.4 per cent.
Morgan highlighted Man
GLG Undervalued Assets
and JOHCM UK Equity
Income funds, up 22.7 per
cent and 24.6 per cent
respectively over five years.
Hollands said that Artemis
UK Select and Temple Bar
Trust, up 45.5 per cent and
14 per cent respectively over
five years, could suit those
looking for funds that buy
cheap shares. TB Evenlode
Income and Liontrust UK
Growth seek faster-growing
companies and are up
38.7 per cent and 31.9 per
cent over five years.
For exposure to medium
and smaller companies,
Hollands picked the AXA
Framlington UK Mid Cap
fund and the Henderson
Smaller Companies trust.
They have returned 35.3 per
cent and 59.1 per cent over
five years. Morgan likes the
FTF Franklin UK Smaller
Companies fund, up
62 per cent over five years.

For years many of us showed
our home bias by investing in
British businesses. The tech
boom then led to a shift and
we profited from favouring
global funds with high
exposure to American shares.
Now everything could be
coming full circle.
Ten years ago there was
twice as much cash invested
in “all-companies funds”,
which hold shares in all sizes
of British stocks, than in
global funds that invest in
companies worldwide. By
January 2022 there was
almost exactly the same in
both sectors, according to the
Investment Association, the
fund industry body.
That is no surprise. Over
five years the S&P 500 index
of large US companies is up
89.3 per cent while the FTSE
100 of blue-chip UK firms has
risen 3 per cent. The FTSE
250 index of medium-sized
UK stocks is up 7.8 per cent.
“For some time, the UK
market was widely seen as a
graveyard of old-fashioned
companies — obsolete oil
majors, polluting miners,
staid banks and legacy

telecoms,” said Rob Morgan
from Charles Stanley, a
wealth manager.
Over 12 months, however,
the S&P 500 and FTSE 100
are up by the same amount,
9 per cent, and the FTSE 100
has risen 0.6 per cent against
the S&P 500’s 7 per cent loss
so far in 2022. This is because
American stocks are seen as
expensive while Britain is
cheap and has powered
ahead as the oil majors and
miners thrive.
Morgan said: “If inflation
proves to be more than
transitory, interest rates rise,
supply chains become more

localised and globalisation
recedes, the UK could sustain
this outperformance.”
UK stocks make up less
than 5 per cent of global
markets, as measured by the
MSCI World index. Morgan
said that this should be seen
as a good starting point for
investors and suggested a
home bias for 15 per cent of
your portfolio — or more if
you aim to draw an income
from your investments —
“because the UK market
contains lots of high-yielding
opportunities”.
Jason Hollands at the
Bestinvest platform suggested
putting 30-35 per cent in UK
stocks to mitigate any
currency risk.
For those looking to jump
on the UK bandwagon
cheaply, a low-cost fund that
tracks the shares of British
stock markets could work.
Morgan picked the iShares
Core FTSE 100 exchange
traded fund, which has a
0.09 per cent fee, while
Hollands suggested Fidelity
Index UK, at 0.06 per cent.
Long-term investors might
prefer medium and small
companies because they tend
to perform better. Rob

David Brenchley

0.6%
FTSE 100 rise in


  1. The S&P
    500 has lost 7%


There has been so much talk about
frozen thresholds that the chancellor has
earned the nickname Mr Freeze.
And while campaigners rally for
income tax thresholds and personal
allowances to increase, there is one
less talked-about threshold that hasn’t
changed since it was introduced in 2017
— the house-price ceiling for
Lifetime Isas (Lisas).
The government’s Lisa gives savers a
25 per cent boost provided that they use
the cash towards a house deposit or
retirement. If the money is withdrawn
for any other reason, there is a
25 per cent penalty (which digs into
some of the saver’s own money as well as
the bonus).
Sounds somewhat fair, but there is a
ceiling. The money can be used to buy a
house only if it is worth £450,000 or
less. While this sounds like a lot, for first-
time buyers hoping to get a place in or
around London or the southeast, it
really isn’t. It also penalises those who
get on the property ladder later in life
and need a bigger family home.
When the Lisa was launched in 2017,
houses cost an average of £218,642,
according to the Office for National
Statistics. In January the average price
hit £273,762, a 25 per cent increase. The
Lisa limit would be more like £563,000
today if it had increased in line with
house prices.
The Treasury should increase the
limit or, better still, scrap it altogether. If
it doesn’t, it risks penalising those who
have done the right things.

Mr Freeze


should thaw


the Lisa


threshold


2.3m


People in the UK hold cryptocurrency

I


f you were at university in the mid-
Nineties, there was a hot tip for
making money quickly — just open
a savings account with a building
society. It was not that their
accounts were suddenly paying
huge rates of interest, but rather
that you could cash in on the demu-
tualisation boom.
A colleague who was at univer-
sity at the time recalled how everyone on
campus suddenly signed up to Halifax
and put in a bit of their student loan. If
you held at least £100 at the end of 1996
you were given a minimum of 200 shares
worth £1,469 when the society demutual-
ised. Hurrah for carpetbagging.
What none of these students realised
at the time, of course, was that they were
helping to kill off the building society sec-
tor. Few cared about whether Halifax or
Abbey National, Northern Rock or Brad-
ford & Bingley were mutuals or listed
banks. It was the cash that mattered. A
decade later many former building socie-
ties had been run so disastrously that
they ended up at the heart of the financial
crisis. Most don’t exist any more.
Race forward to today and what are
young people interested in now? Crypto-
currency.
“I’m choosing between crypto or
Tesla,” one friend said last week. He is a
doctor and is deciding where to funnel
the extra cash he will make when he
moves up the job ladder next month. He
already has a healthy stocks-and-shares
portfolio, having made nearly 200 per
cent on his Tesla shares over the past few
years.
“Tesla is probably going to have to
come down a bit though, isn’t it? Maybe
crypto is best,” he pondered.
Another friend asked him which cryp-
tocurrency he would choose. She has
made about £2,000 from bitcoin over the
past four years, selling some when prices
were high and buying smaller amounts
every so often. She has done far better
than me; I bought about £480 of bitcoin
in September and it’s now worth £440.
About 2.3 million people in the UK
now hold cryptocurrency, according to
the City regulator, the Financial Conduct
Authority (FCA). The average holding is
about £300.
About a third of crypto holders told
the FCA that cryptocurrencies were “bet-
ter than investments provided in the
mainstream financial sector”.
Are today’s young crypto investors any

These younger investors are not fools.
Instead of trying to convince them to
avoid such investments, we need to
improve consumer protections in what is
quickly becoming a mainstream market.
Without proper regulation, the sharks
can prey. Research from Lloyds Bank
shows that victims under the age of 45
now account for 70 per cent of reported
investment scams, primarily after being
lured by fake ads on social media promot-
ing cryptocurrency. The average loss was
£8,585.
Last month the Advertising Standards
Authority told more than 50 cryptocur-
rency companies to review their ads to
make sure they were not misleading. The
deadline is the start of May.
In January the government said it
planned to strengthen the rules on
crypto ads and bring promotions in line
with other financial ads. This would go
some way to helping the problem, but it is
not expected to happen before next year.
We need to speed up the process.
Today’s crypto investors are behaving in
a rational manner in the face of a market
that is behaving irrationally. It’s time to
give them some protection.

BUOYANT BITCOIN


Price of Bitcoin

$80k

0

20

40

60

2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
Source: CoinGecko

SOARING HOUSE PRICES


Price of average house

£280k

200

220

240

260

2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
Source: Nationwide

Investors withdrew about
£2.4 billion from bond funds
in February as fears grew
over high inflation and
rising interest rates.
Bonds — government or
company debt — tend to be
unpopular during times of
inflation and rising interest
rates because the fixed return
offered by the investment is
unlikely to match the
increase in the cost of living.
They become less attractive
as other rates in the market
head skyward.
The UK ten-year gilt is
yielding about 1.7 per cent,

western sanctions and
supply-chain disruption,
will only become clear in the
months ahead.”
The bestselling
investments were North
American funds, which
collectively had an inflow of
£570 million as investors
looked to buy the dip in the
US market. Investors bought
£322 million of global funds,
which are heavily weighted
towards US stocks.
Investors shirked equities
in general, however. A net
£47 million was sold overall,
and withdrawals from UK
equity funds amounted to
£989 million.

which is high compared with
the past few years but still
significantly lower than
inflation, which is predicted
to end up averaging 7.4 per
cent this year.
A net £2.5 billion was
taken out of investment
funds in February, according
to the Investment
Association, a trade body.
This is more than double the
£1.2 billion withdrawn from
the market in January.
“High inflation and
growing economic
uncertainty provided an
uncomfortable backdrop for
escalating tensions between
Russia and Ukraine

throughout February,” said
Chris Cummings from the
Investment Association.
“The full economic
impact, including the
long-term market impacts of

Imogen Tew

1.7%
Yield on ten-year
gilts. Inflation is
forecast at 7.4%
Free download pdf