312 ■ CHAPTER 17 Animals and Human Evolution
BIODIVERSITY
four Neanderthal fossils in 2004) was compared
to modern human mitochondrial DNA, and the
tests showed that there was no genetic over-
lap between the species. Mitochondrial DNA
(mtDNA) is unique because it is passed down
virtually unchanged from mother to child, so
it can be tracked from one generation, or one
species, to another (Figure 17.11). But modern
Homo sapiens did not have Neanderthal mito-
chondrial DNA, so it appeared there was no
interbreeding, at least not involving female
Neanderthals.
That mitochondrial work was performed
by Svante Pääbo and researchers at the Max
Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology
in Leipzig, Germany. Pääbo is one of the found-
ers of the effort to use genetics to study early
Hominins United
“For years, it was a very simple story: Neander-
thals either disappeared quickly when modern
humans came or they integrated with humans,”
says Condemi. But she suspected that the
dynamic was more complex. “In some regions,
Neanderthals disappeared very quickly. In other
regions, we have evidence the two [species]
could have overlapped.” Researchers, including
Condemi, had often suggested that during the
overlap, Neanderthals and humans interbred.
But there was little physical evidence.
Even DNA evidence initially suggested that
there was no interbreeding. DNA from the mito-
chondria of Neanderthals (isolated first from a
single Neanderthal fossil in 1997 and then from
Australopithecus africanus
(3 mya)
Homo habilis
(1.9–1.6 mya)
Homo erectus
(1.5 mya)
Homo sapiens
(anatomically modern humans
200,000 years ago to present)
Australopithecus
afarensis (3.5 mya)
The braincase is relatively small.
Skull and teeth resemble those
of other apes, not humans.
The braincase is larger. Skull and
teeth depart from those of other apes.
The Homo lineage split
from the Australopithecus
lineage.
All five hominins shown here
walked upright on two legs.
Figure 17.10
A gallery of hominin skulls
This tree shows the evolutionary relationships and the skulls of five hominin species. A complete
evolutionary tree of hominins would be “bushier,” with multiple side branches emerging at different times.
Q1: Where would the Neanderthal species branch be on this tree?
Q2: How would the Neanderthal skull differ from the Homo erectus skull?
Q3: How would the Neanderthal skull differ from the Homo sapiens skull?