56 Business The Economist April 16th 2022
TheRussiaremainers
Reputation v
revenue
A
ndrij melnyk, the Ukrainian ambas
sador in Berlin, did not hold back.
Mocking Ritter Sport’s advertising slogan,
he tweeted on March 29th “Quadratisch,
Praktisch, Blut” (square, practical, blood),
replacing gut (good) in the firm’s slogan. A
couple of days later Dmytro Kuleba,
Ukraine’s foreign minister, called for a
boycott of the maker of chocolate snacks
tweeting: “Ritter Sport refuses to pull out
of Russia citing possible ‘serious effects’
for the company. However, remaining in
Russia brings worse effects, such as a fatal
damage to reputation.”
Companies often comply with at least
some of these type of demands for reasons
unrelated to the immediate impact on the
bottom line. “Calls for boycotts usually
have very little impact on sales, but the me
dia spotlight can do much harm to the
brand equity,” says Brayden King at North
western University in Illinois. The more
media coverage a company gets the bigger
the potential future damage.
Ritter Sport, a familyowned firm that is
over 100 years old, is taking the risk. It tried
to explain its decision to continue doing
business in Russia, its secondbiggest
market after Germany, accounting for
around 10% of sales. If it stopped deliveries
in the country, many of its suppliers, cocoa
farmers in west Africa and Latin America,
would lose out. “We are not an internation
al conglomerate that can simply stop some
business activity here to shift to another
over there,” says the firm. But it promised
to cease advertising and investing in Rus
sia and donate all profits from sales there
to charity.
This is not enough for activists, who
continue to call for a boycott, spreading
the word through social media. They tend
to go after firms with a good reputation
such as Ritter Sport because their criti
cisms are likely to be more damaging and
hence more effective. Recent efforts to bur
nish its image include promises to become
carbon neutral by 2025, and using only
sustainablygrown cocoa from decently
paid farmers. “Ritter Sport is a highin
volvement product,” says Colin Fernando
of BrandTrust, a marketing consultancy,
which means that it is supposed to repre
sent its customers’ selfimage. Continued
involvement in Russia may leave a nasty
taste in the mouth.
Campaigners will take heart that they
have forced Nestlé, a Swiss giant, to change
B ERLIN
Companies are fearful of calls for
consumer boycotts
Russiansanctions
The ordnance in
the arsenal
P
residentjoebidenhaspromisedto
“ratchetupthepain”forVladimirPutin
overRussianatrocitiesinUkraine.Theeu
vowswave after wave of “rolling sanc
tions”.MomentumisgrowingintheWest
tofirethetwobigeconomicweaponsthat
havesofarbeenkeptlargelylockedinthe
arsenal:anembargoonRussianoiland
gas, and “secondary” sanctions, which
wouldpenalisepeopleandentitiesfrom
othercountriesthattradewithRussia.
TheEuropeanCommissionispushing
hardfortheeutocurbRussianenergyim
ports,paymentsforwhichhelpfundRus
sia’sarmedforces.Sofar,however,thebloc
hasbannedjustcoal,whichmakesuponly
around5% of Russian hydrocarbon ex
portsto theeu—andwithafourmonth
phaseout.Bigimporters,includingGer
manyandItaly,remainwaryofanimmedi
atebanonoilorgas.Hungary,whosesup
portisneededbecauseoftheeu’s unanim
ityprinciple, is morestrongly opposed,
andhascalledtheissuea “redline”.
However,pressureisgrowingonthe
footdraggerstoacceptsomesortofblock
ade.A formeradvisertoMrPutinhassaida
full oilandgas embargo could endthe
war.Ukraine’spresidenthassteppedup
criticismofGermanyforitscoyness.Paul
Krugman,aneconomistandcommenta
tor,hascontrastedGermany’s reluctance
toacceptsharpeconomicpainwithitsin
sistencethatGreeceandothercountriesdo
justthatintheeurozonecrisisof200912.
Anenergyembargowasnotformallydis
cussedata meetingofeuforeignministers
onApril11th.Butseveralideasshortofan
outrightbanarepercolating.
OneistoimposetariffsonRussianhy
drocarbons. Another, emanating from
America,istotakea pageoutoftheIran
playbook.Whenseveralalliescomplained
thatsanctionsagainsttheIslamicRepublic
a decadeagowouldleavethemshortofoil,
Americadevelopedaworkaround.Other
countriescouldcontinuetobuyIranianoil
if theypledgedtoreducerelianceonit over
time.Thepaymentswentintoescrowac
counts.Iranagreedtothisarrangementin
part because it was permitted to use a
chunkoftheparkedmoneyfornonsensi
tive goods like consumables. “It func
tionedlikepocketmoney,”saysAdamM.
SmithofGibsonDunn,a lawfirm.
Russia would almost certainly reject
suchanarrangement.ButMrSmiththinks
itcouldbetempted by sweeteners.One
might be to allow it to use some of the cash
in escrow to buy hightech items that have
been hit with Western export controls.
Support for secondary sanctions is
strongest in America’s Congress. Its law
makers are keen to “get back on the game”
afterleavingsanctionspolicy mostly to Mr
Bidensofar,saysanother sanctions law
yer.Morethana dozensanctionsrelated
billsarecirculatingonCapitol Hill. Several
couldbecomelawintheweeks after Con
gressreturnsfromEasterrecess. But when
Americaimposedsecondary sanctions on
Iran,theywerecontroversial: Europe even
createda legalmechanism to try to neu
tralisethem(whichfailed). With the out
rageoverRussianwarcrimes as strong in
BrusselsasinWashington, however, this
timeisdifferent.
Such sanctions could be imposed in
oneoftwoways,saysMrSmith: explicitly,
throughofficialmeasures, or implicitly, by
leaningonothercountries. American offi
cialsareunderstoodtohave raised the is
sueona recentvisittoIndia. “The threat
couldbesanctions,orcurbs on correspon
dentbanking,orincreased red tape such as
enhanced checks on investment and
trade,”reckonsMrSmith.“Iran is still fresh
in minds. When America says to other
countries,‘Becareful’,they know what it is
talkingabout.”
Thebigquestionwith secondary sanc
tionsishowChinawould react. It has cir
cumventedWesternsanctions on Iran and
NorthKoreabytradingwith them through
smallChinesebankswith no connections
toWesternfinancialcentres—and which
arethuslessexposedtosanctions. Wheth
eritcoulddothesamewith Russia’s much
larger,moregloballyconnectedeconomy
isunclear.Thestakeswouldbea lot higher,
forbothChinaandtheWest.n
What other weapons could the West
wheel out?
Heat from the streets