352
21.4 Study of Arctic Char
Most of the fi sh fauna monitoring done on the lake has
focused on its most emblematic species—the Arctic char.
Indeed, Arctic char is as highly prized by anglers as it is by
the manager of the lake restaurant. Relatively large stocks
have been taken for years, but changes in the trophic status of
the lake are now a cause for major concern over the future of
this species.
21.4.1 Biology of the Species
Its biological requirements have been well documented in a
great number of lakes, but not in Lake Pavin where few stud-
ies have focused on fi sh. In 1995, Jamet tracked the repro-
duction, feeding, and body weight patterns of the Arctic char
in Lake Pavin. In 1997 , Léveillé led a study on the use of
fatty acids as organic markers of transfer in the phytoplank-
ton, zooplankton, and Arctic char food chains.
FDPPMA 1995
FDPPMA 1996
FDPPMA 1997
FDPPMA 1998
FDPPMA 1999 FDPPMA 2000
FDPPMA 2001 FDPPMA 2002
FDPPMA 2003 FDPPMA 2004
FDPPMA 2005ASCONIT 2005
ONEMA 2013
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
obl tac per
che rot gar
gou
Fig. 21.4 Annual evolution of CPUE (Catch Per Unit
Effort * 1000) by species and year ( Obl: Salvelinus
alpinus ; Tac: Oncorhynchus mikiss ; Per: Perca fl uviatilis;
Rot: Scardinius erythrophtalmus ; Che: Squalius cephalus ;
Gar: Rutilus rutilus; Gou: Gobio sp)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
obl trf tac per che rot gar gou car tan
FDPPMA ASCONIT ONEMA
Fig. 21.5 Comparison on a CPUE
(*1000) basis ( Obl: Salvelinus
alpinus ; Trf: Salmo trutta ; Tac:
Oncorhynchus mikiss; Per: Perca
fl uviatilis ; Che: Squalius cephalus ;
Rot: Scardinius erythrophtalmus
Gar: Rutilus rutilus ; Gou: Gobio
sp ; Car: Carassius auratus ; Tan:
Tinca tinca)
F. D e s m o l l e s