357
misunderstanding with the people responsible for carrying
out the work, individuals got tagged several consecutive
years with the same type of tag (adipose ablation). The fi rst
years of tagging are not exploitable from a statistical point
of view, and we can draw no information from this type of
tag.
In the second type of tagging realized, either the adipose
fi n is clipped or color marking is used, thus making it possi-
ble to differentiate separate cohorts. While this tagging
methodology makes it possible to specify the year of release,
the people in charge of emptying the nets forgot to record the
type of tag as well as the size of the fi sh caught, thus render-
ing any attempt to follow the stock by tag futile.
21.4.2.5 Tracking According to WFD Protocol
NF EN 14757
This standardized protocol was implemented when the Water
Framework Directive was adopted in order to qualify the sta-
tus of European bodies of water both above and below
ground. Monitoring on the fi sh populations in water bodies is
performed according to standard WFD protocol NF EN
14757 (AFNOR 2005 ). The engineering consulting fi rm
ASCONIT (ASCONIT 2006 ) and the ONEMA (Olivier
2012 ) performed two samplings on Lake Pavin in 2005 and
2012.
This method provides a fairly comprehensive picture of
the fi sh population and its spatial distribution.
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
18000
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
Fig. 21.11 Ratio of 1 + juveniles number
( blue ) to CPUE (×100) 2 years later (red)
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
Fig. 21.12 Comparison of changes in
CPUE (*100, blue ) and estimated
number of catchable fi sh from
stocking ( red )
21 History of the Fish Fauna of Lake Pavin: A Population Heavily Infl uenced by Man?