5 Towards an Understanding of Embryo Donation ... 135Daniels, K. R., & Lewis, G. M. (1996). Donor insemination: The gifting and
selling of semen. Social Science and Medicine, 42 (11), 1521–1536.
de Lacey, S. (2005). Parent identity and “virtual” children: Why patients dis-
card rather than donate unused embryos. Human Reproduction, 20 (6),
1661–1669.
de Lacey, S. (2007a). Decisions for the fate of frozen embryos: Fresh insights
into patients’ thinking and their rationales for donating or discarding
embryos. Human Reproduction, 22 (6), 1751–1758.
de Lacey, S. (2007b). Patients’ attitudes to their embryos and their des-
tiny: Social conditioning? Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics and
Gynaecology, 21 (1), 101–112.
de Lacey, S., Rogers, W., & Richards, B. (2010). Directed embryo donation:
Free choice or discrimination? Journal of Law and Medicine, 18 (1), 169–
177.
Ethics Committee on Assisted Reproductive Technology (ECART). (2012).
Annual Report 2011–2012, Wellington: ECART. Retrieved from http://www.
ecart.health.govt.nz/publications-and-resources/annual-reports.
Eydoux, P., Thepot, F., Fellmann, F., Francannet, C., Simon-Bouy, B.,
Jouannet, P., et al. (2004). How can the genetic risks of embryo dona-
tion be minimized? Proposed guidelines of the French Federation of
CECOS (Centre d’Etude et de Conservation des Oeufs et du Sperme).
Human Reproduction, 19 (8), 1685–1688. doi:10.1093/humrep/
deh328.
Frith, L., Blyth, E., Paul, M. S., & Berger, R. (2011). Conditional embryo
relinquishment: Choosing to relinquish embryos for family-building
through a Christian embryo ‘adoption’ programme. Human Reproduction,
26 (12), 3327–3338.
Fuscaldo, G., Russell, S., & Gillam, L. (2007). How to facilitate decisions
about surplus embryos: Patients’ views. Human Reproduction, 22 (12),
3129–3138.
Goedeke, S. (2014). Understandings and experiences of embryo donation in New
Zealand, Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. Auckland, Auckland University
of Technology.
Goedeke, S., Daniels, K., & Thorpe, M. (2016). Embryo donation and coun-
selling for the welfare of donors, recipients, their families and children.
Human Reproduction, 31 (2), 412–417.
http://www.ebook3000.com