241- Ross M, Pawley A, Osmond M, editors. The lexicon of Proto Oceanic: 3. Plants. Canberra:
Pacifi c Linguistics; 2008. - Ross M, Pawley A, Osmond M, editors. The lexicon of Proto Oceanic: 4. Animals. Canberra:
Pacifi c Linguistics; 2011. - Wierzbicka A. “Apples” are not a “kind of fruit”. Am Ethnol. 1984;11(2):313–28.
- Pawley A, Syder F. Two puzzles for linguistic theory: native like selection and native like
fl uency. In: Richards J, Schmidt R, editors. Language and communication. London: Longman;
1983. - Boroditsky L, Fuhrman O, McCormick K. Do English and Mandarin speakers think about
time differently? Cognition. 2011;118(1):123–9. - Winawer J, Witthoft N, Frank M, Wu L, Wade A, Boroditsky L. Russian blues reveal effects
of language on color discrimination. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104(19):7780–5. - Danziger S, Ward R. Language changes implicit associations between ethnic groups and
evaluation in bilinguals. Psychol Sci. 2010;21(6):799–800. - Cashdan E. A sensitive period for learning about food. Hum Nat. 1994;5(3):279–91.
- Barsalou L. Flexibility, structure and linguistic vagary in concepts: manifestations of a com-
positional system of perceptual symbols. In: Collins A, Gathercole S, Conway M, Morris P,
editors. Theories of memory. Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1993. - Barsalou L. Ad hoc categories. Mem Cognit. 1983;11(3):211–27.
- Barsalou L, Wilson C, Hasenkamp W. On the vices of nominalization and the virtues of con-
textualizing. In: Mesquita B, Barrett L, Smith E, editors. The mind in context. New York:
Guilford Press; 2010. p. 334–60. - Barrett L, Mesquita B, Smith E. The context principle. In: Mesquita B, Barrett L, Smith E,
editors. The mind in context. New York: Guilford Press; 2010. - Yeh W, Barsalou L. The situated nature of concepts. Am J Psychol. 2006;119(3):349–84.
- Medin D, Lynch E, Coley J, Atran S. Categorization and reasoning among tree experts: do all
roads lead to Rome? Cognit Psychol. 1997;32:49–96. - Boster J, Johnson J. Form or function: a comparison of expert and novice judgements of simi-
larity among fi sh. Am Anthropol. 1989;91(4):866–89. - Ameel E, Storms G, Malt B, Sloman S. How bilinguals solve the naming problem. J Mem
Lang. 2005;53:60–80. - Malt B, Sloman S, Gennari S, Shi M, Wang Y. Knowing versus naming: similarity and the
linguistic categorization of artifacts. J Mem Lang. 1999;40:230–62. - Ellen R. Variable constructs in Nuaulu zoological classifi cation. Social Sci Inf.
1975;14:201–28. - Sillitoe P. Contested knowledge, contingent classifi cation: animals in the Highlands of Papua
New Guinea. Am Anthropol. 2002;104(4):1162–71. - Ross B, Murphy G. Food for thought: cross-classifi cation and category organization in a
complex real-world domain. Cognit Psychol. 1999;38:495–553. - Hunn E. The utilitarian factor in folk biological classifi cation. Am Anthropol.
1982;4:830–47. - Forth G. Nage birds: classifi cation and symbolism among an Eastern Indonesian people.
New York: Routledge; 2004. - Kitchin R. Cognitive maps: what are they and why study them? J Environ Psychol.
1994;14:1–19. - Milroy J, Milroy L. Linguistic change, social network and speaker innovation. J Ling.
1985;21:339–84. - Labov W. Sociolinguistic patterns. Oxford: Basil Blackwell; 1972.
- Boster J. “Requiem for the omniscient informant”: there’s life in the old girl yet. In: Dougherty
J, editor. Directions in cognitive anthropology. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press;
1985. p. 177–97. - Gardner P. Birds, words, and a requiem for the omniscient informant. Am Ethnol.
1976;3(3):446–68.
References