The Traditional Ecological Knowledge of the Solega A Linguistic Perspective

(Dana P.) #1

246



  1. Bulmer R. Which came fi rst, the chicken or the egg-head? In: Pouillon J, Maranda P, editors.
    Echanges et communications, melanges offerts a Claude Levi-Strauss, vol. 2. Paris/The
    Hague: Mouton; 1970. p. 1069–91.

  2. Ghorpade K. Current species identities and scientifi c names of Indian birds: doubts, queries
    and counsel. Curr Sci. 2011;100(7):981–3.

  3. Oiseaux.net. Family: Nectariniidae. Moulin de Bazoncourt: Écopains d’abord 2005 [29
    August 2011]; Available from: http://www.oiseaux.net/birds/nectariniidae.html.

  4. Peterson A, Navarro-Siguenza A. Consistency of taxonomic treatments: a response to
    Remsen (2005). Auk. 2006;123(3):885–7.

  5. Ichikawa M. The birds as indicators of the invisible world: ethno-ornithology of the Mbuti
    hunter-gatherers. Afr Stud Monogr. 1998;25(Suppl):105–21.

  6. Kizungu B, Ntabaza M, Mburunge M. Ethno-ornithology of the Tembo in Eastern DRC (for-
    mer Zaire): Part one. Kalehe Zone. Afr Stud Monogr. 1998;19(2):103–13.

  7. Hunn E. Sahaptin bird classifi cation. In: Pawley A, editor. Man and a half. Auckland: The
    Polynesian Society; 1991. p. 137–47.

  8. Goodale E, Kotagama S. Vocal mimicry by a passerine bird attracts other species involved in
    mixed-species fl ocks. Anim Behav. 2006;72:471–7.

  9. Magrath R, Pitcher B, Gardner J. A mutual understanding? Interspecifi c responses by birds
    to each other’s aerial alarm calls. Behav Ecol. 2007;18(5):945–51.

  10. Finn F. Indian sporting birds. London: Francis Edwards; 1915.

  11. Hume A. In: Oates E, editor. The nest and eggs of Indian birds. London: R. H. Porter; 1889.

  12. Jones DB. Proteins of the castor bean - their preparation, properties and utilization. J Am Oil
    Chem Soc. 1947;24:247–51.

  13. Logan C, Johnston T. Synthesis and separation in the history of “nature” and “nurture”. Dev
    Psychobiol. 2007;49:758–69.

  14. Wyman R. Experimental analysis of nature-nurture interactions. J Exp Zool A Comp Exp
    Biol. 2005;303A(6):415–21.

  15. Nisbett R, Norenzayan A. Culture and cognition. In: Pashler H, Medin D, editors. Stevens’
    handbook of experimental psychology. 3rd ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley; 2002.

  16. Dunn M, Greenhill SJ, Levinson SC, Gray RD. Evolved structure of language shows lineage-
    specifi c trends in word-order universals. Nature. 2011;473(7345):79–82.

  17. Hallpike CR. The foundations of primitive thought. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1979.

  18. Mark D, Turk A, Burenhult N, Stea D. Landscape in language: an introduction. In: Mark D,
    Turk A, Burenhult N, Stea D, editors. Landscape in language: transdisciplinary perspectives.
    Amsterdam: John Benjamins; 2011.

  19. Johnson L, Hunn E, editors. Landscape ethnoecology: concepts of biotic and physical space.
    New York: Berghahn; 2011.

  20. Hunn E, Meilleur B. Toward a theory of landscape ethnoecological classifi cation. In: Mann
    L, Hunn E, editors. Landscape ethnoecology: concepts of biotic and physical space.
    New York: Berghahn; 2011.

  21. Gärling T, Book A, Lindberg E. Cognitive mapping of large-scale environments: the interre-
    lationship of action plans, acquisition, and orientation. Environ Behav. 1984;16(3):3–34.

  22. Leutgeb S, Leutgeb J, Barnes C, Moser E, McNaughton B, Moser M-B. Independent codes
    for spatial and episodic memory in hippocampal neuronal ensembles. Science.
    2005;309:619–23.

  23. McNaughton B, Battaglia F, Jensen O, Moser E, Moser M-B. Path integration and the neural
    basis of the ‘cognitive map’. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2006;7:663–78.

  24. Pocock D. Some characteristics of mental maps: an empirical study. Trans Inst Br Geogr New
    Ser. 1976;1(4):493–512.

  25. Linde C, Labov W. Spatial networks as a site for the study of language and thought. Language.
    1975;51(4):924–39.

  26. Burrow T, Emeneau M. A Dravidian etymological dictionary. 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon
    Press; 1984.


References
Free download pdf