14
5 Summary and Conclusions
The Table 1.1 presents evidence statements based on a summary of the evidence
given in this chapter. The evidence is such that exercise has been described as
today’s best buy in public health [ 91 ]. It’s time to take physical inactivity seriously
and we agree with those who would have policies to increase both physical activity
and cardiorespiratory fitness [ 43 , 48 ].
Acknowledgement Hamer acknowledges support from the National Institute for Health Research
(NIHR) Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, which is a partnership between University
Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Loughborough University and the University of Leicester.
References
- Townsend N, Wilson L, Bhatnagar P et al (2016) Cardiovascular disease in Europe: epidemio-
logical update 2016. Eur Heart J 37(42):3232– - Hansson GK, Libby P (2006) The immune response in atherosclerosis: a double-edged sword.
Nat Rev Immunol 6(7):508– - Luengo-Fernandez R, Leal J, Gray A et al (2006) Cost of cardiovascular diseases in the United
Kingdom. Heart 92(10):1384–
Table 1.1 Goals and recommendations for physical activity and cardiovascular disease risk
Evidencea
Goal Evidence statement Type Strength
Minimal benefit
At least 150 minutes of
moderate-intensity aerobic
activity per week
Physical activity is inversely associated
with cardiovascular disease risk
C 1
Physical activity acts favourably on low
grade inflammation and haemostasis
B 3
Physical activity acts favourably on
lipid profiles
B 1
Physical activity reduces blood pressure B 1
Physical activity improves
cardiorespiratory fitness
B 1
Greater benefit
Performing some
vigorous-intensity aerobic
exercise on a weekly basis
Vigorous exercise confers greater
protection against cardiovascular
mortality, especially in men
C 2
Moderate- to vigorous-
intensity activity
Moderate-vigorous activity confers
‘optimal’ benefits for blood pressure
lowering, haemostasis and lipid levels
B 3
aType of evidence: (A) major randomized, controlled trials (RCTs); (B) smaller RCTs and meta-
analyses of other clinical trials; (C) observational and metabolic studies; (D) clinical experience.
Strength of evidence: (1) very strong evidence; (2) moderately strong evidence; (3) strong trend
M. Hamer et al.