Skull Base Surgery of the Posterior Fossa

(avery) #1
85

increased CSF pressure as suggested by imaging
findings (e.g., dilated ventricles, empty sella,
dilated optic nerves). Finally, the route for tumor
resection should be adequate to reconstruct the
skull base, thus avoiding the morbidity of a sec-
ond approach.
The authors favor reconstruction of skull base
defects using pedicled vascular flaps, multilayer
reconstruction techniques, and the aforemen-
tioned principles, especially for central skull base
defects. However, multiple options are available
to reconstruct the skull base bone and dura and
can be divided in free grafts, synthetic/heterolo-
gous materials, and vascularized flaps.
Free autografts imply the harvesting of tissue
from a donor site that is then transferred and
implanted in a recipient site. They lack their own
vascularization as there is no attachment to the
donor site; therefore, they require a well-
vascularized recipient bed to optimize the take of
the graft. Commonly used free autografts include
the following: free mucoperiosteal/ mucoperi-
chondrial autograft, autologous fascia lata graft,
free fat autograft, free cartilage autograft, and
free bone autograft. The synthetic and heterolo-
gous materials most commonly used are collagen
matrix and acellular dermal matrix processed
from banked human cadaver skin [ 45 ].
There are numerous vascularized flaps that
can be used to reconstruct the ventral skull base,
and they are divided into intranasal or local and
extranasal or regional. The main intranasal flaps
that are suitable for reconstruction of petroclival
defects include the nasoseptal flap, the posteri-
orly based lateral nasal wall flap, and the inferior
turbinate flap. The main extranasal flaps are the
temporoparietal fascia flap and the pericranial
flap. Lumbar drain is not used routinely, but may
be considered in large posterior fossa dural
defects [ 45 ].


References


  1. Jho HD, Carrau RL. Endoscopic endonasal trans-
    sphenoidal surgery: experience with 50 patients.
    J Neurosurg. 1997;87(1):44–51.

  2. Cavallo LM, Messina A, Cappabianca P, Esposito F,
    de Divitiis E, Gardner P, Tschabitscher M. Endoscopic


endonasal surgery of the midline skull base: ana-
tomical study and clinical considerations. Neurosurg
Focus. 2005;19(1):1–4.


  1. Kassam A, Snyderman CH, Mintz A, Gardner P,
    Carrau RL. Expanded endonasal approach: the ros-
    trocaudal axis. Part I. Crista galli to the sella turcica.
    Neurosurg Focus. 2005;19(1):1–2.

  2. Kassam A, Snyderman CH, Mintz A, Gardner P,
    Carrau RL. Expanded endonasal approach: the rostro-
    caudal axis. Part II. Posterior clinoids to the foramen
    magnum. Neurosurg Focus. 2005;19(1):1–7.

  3. Beer-Furlan A, Evins AI, Rigante L, Anichini G, Stieg
    PE, Bernardo A. Dual-port 2D and 3D endoscopy:
    expanding the limits of the endonasal approaches
    to midline skull base lesions with lateral extension.
    J Neurol Surg Part B: Skull Base. 2014;75(03):187–97.

  4. Bailey BJ, Johnson JT, Newlands SD, editors. Head
    & neck surgery – otolaryngology. Philadelphia:
    Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2006. p. 3855–76.

  5. Bloch O, Parsa AT. Skull base chondrosarcoma:
    evidence- based treatment paradigms. Neurosurg Clin
    N Am. 2013;24(1):89–96.

  6. Brackmann DE, Teufert KB. Chondrosarcoma of
    the skull base: long-term follow-up. Otol Neurotol.
    2006;27(7):981–91.

  7. Uhl M, Mattke M, Welzel T, Oelmann J, Habl G, Jensen
    AD, Ellerbrock M, Haberer T, Herfarth KK, Debus
    J. High control rate in patients with chondrosarcoma
    of the skull base after carbon ion therapy: first report
    of long-term results. Cancer. 2014;120(10):1579–85.

  8. Jones PS, Aghi MK, Muzikansky A, Shih HA, Barker
    FG, Curry WT. Outcomes and patterns of care in adult
    skull base chondrosarcomas from the SEER database.
    J Clin Neurosci. 2014;21(9):1497–502.

  9. Frassanito P, Massimi L, Rigante M, Tamburrini G,
    Conforti G, Di Rocco C, Caldarelli M. Recurrent and
    self-remitting sixth cranial nerve palsy: pathophysio-
    logical insight from skull base chondrosarcoma: report
    of 2 cases. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2013;12(6):633–6.

  10. Bailey BJ, Johnson JT, Newlands SD, editors. Head
    & neck surgery – otolaryngology. Philadelphia:
    Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2006. p. 1725–44.

  11. Frank G, Sciarretta V, Calbucci F, Farneti G,
    Mazzatenta D, Pasquini E. The endoscopic transnasal
    transsphenoidal approach for the treatment of cranial
    base chordomas and chondrosarcomas. Neurosurgery.
    2006;59(1):ONS-50.

  12. Mangussi-Gomes J, Beer-Furlan A, Balsalobre L,
    Vellutini EA, Stamm AC. Endoscopic endonasal
    management of skull base chordomas: surgical tech-
    nique, nuances, and pitfalls. Otolaryngol Clin N Am.
    2016;49(1):167–82.

  13. Qiu QH, Liang MZ, Liu H, Chen SH, Zhang HB,
    Zhang QH. Nasal endoscopic surgical treatment
    for chondrosarcoma of paranasal sinus and the
    skull base. Zhonghua er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke
    za zhi Chin J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg.
    2010;45(7):551–4.

  14. Beer-Furlan A, Vellutini EA, Balsalobre L, Stamm
    AC. Endoscopic endonasal approach to ventral


6 Endoscopic Endonasal Approach for Posterior Fossa Tumors

Free download pdf