112
Year Combination Pollinator
1985 Mv9 × CS
1986 Mv9 × CS × Mv9
1987 (Mv9 × CS )Mv9 × rye
selfing
1988 (Mv9 × CS)Mv9⊗ ×rye
selfing
1989 (Mv9 × CS)Mv9⊗⊗ ×rye
× Mv9
1990 (Mv9 × CS)Mv9⊗⊗Mv9 × rye
selfing
1991 (Mv9 × CS)Mv9⊗⊗Mv9⊗ ×rye
selfing
1992 (Mv9 × CS)Mv9⊗⊗Mv9⊗⊗ ×rye
×Mv9
1993 (Mv9 × CS)Mv9⊗⊗Mv9⊗⊗Mv9
selfing
1994 (Mv9 × CS)Mv9⊗⊗Mv9⊗⊗Mv9⊗ ×rye
selfing
1995 (Mv9 × CS)Mv9⊗⊗Mv9⊗⊗Mv9⊗⊗ ×rye
× Mv9
1996 (Mv9 × CS)Mv9⊗⊗Mv9⊗⊗Mv9⊗⊗Mv9
selfing
1997 (Mv9 × CS)Mv9⊗⊗Mv9⊗⊗Mv9⊗⊗Mv9⊗ ×rye
selfing
1998 (Mv9 × CS)Mv9⊗⊗Mv9⊗⊗Mv9⊗⊗Mv9⊗⊗ ×rye
×Mv9
1999 (Mv9 × CS)Mv9⊗⊗Mv9⊗⊗Mv9⊗⊗Mv9⊗⊗Mv9 × rye
Fig. 4.1 Scheme for deve loping a Mv9kr1 line fr om a Mv9 × CS hybrid via backcrossing with
Mv9. Progenies were selected based on the seed set obtained when pollinated with rye. After each
backcross two self-pollinated generations were tested for crossability with rye in order to select
plants which carry crossability allele kr1 in the homozygous state
M. Molnár-Láng