348 1. PINNING DOWN POTENTIAL
- I. J. Deary, Intelligence: A Very Short Introduction (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000).
- For references and full discussion, see K. Richardson and S. H. Norgate, “Does IQ
Mea sure Ability for Complex Cognition?” Th eory and Psy chol ogy 24 (December 2015):
795–812. - Royal Society, Brain Waves Module 2: Neuroscience: Implications for Education and
Lifelong Learning (London: Royal Society, 2011), 3. - S. Oyama, Th e Ontogeny of Information (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1984), 31.
- J. G. Daugman, “Brain Meta phor and Brain Th eory,” in Philosophy and the Neuro-
sciences, ed. W. Bechtel et al. (Oxford: Blackwell, 2001), 23–36. - L. S. Gottfredson, “What If the Hereditarian Hypothesis Is True?” Psy chol ogy,
Public Policy, and Law 11 (May 2005): 311–319. - A. W. Toga and P.M. Th ompson, “Ge ne tics of Brain Structure and Intelligence,”
Annual Review of Neuroscience 28 (July 2005): 1–23, 17. - See E. Yong, “Chinese Proj ect Probes the Ge ne tics of Genius: Bid to Unravel the Se-
crets of Brainpower Faces Scepticism,” Nature 497 (May 2013), 297–299. - M. R. Johnson et al., “Systems Ge ne tics Identifi es a Convergent Gene Network for Cog-
nition and Neurodevelopmental Disease,” Nature Neuroscience 19 (January 2016):
223–232. - C. A. Rietveld, S. E. Medland, J. Derringer, J. Yang, T. Esko, et al., “GWAS of 126,559
Individuals Identifi es Ge ne tic Variants Associated with Educational Attainment,”
Science 340 (June 2013): 1467–1471. See also N. M. Davies et al., “Th e Role of Common
Ge ne tic Variation in Educational Attainment and Income: Evidence from the Na-
tional Child Development Study,” Scientifi c Reports 5 (November 2015): 16509, doi:
10.1038/srep16509. - K. Asbury and R. Plomin, G Is for Genes (London: Wiley, 2014), 12.
- G. Davies, A. Tenesa, A. Payton, J. Yang, S. E. Harris, et al., “Genome- Wide Associa-
tion Studies Establish Th at Human Intelligence Is Highly Heritable and Polygenic,”
Molecular Psychiatry 16 (October 2011): 996–1005, 996. - Th is is what Eric Turkheimer calls Jay Joseph over the latter’s exhaustive critique of
twin studies; E. Turkheimer, “Arsonists at the Cathedral,” PsychCritiques 60(40)
(October 2015): 1–4, doi: http:// dx. doi. org / 10. 1037/ a0039763; and J. Joseph, Th e Trou ble
with Twin Studies (London: Routledge, 2014). - E. Turkheimer, “Commentary: Variation and Causation in the Environment and
Genome,” International Journal of Epidemiology 40 (June 2011): 598–601; E. Turkheimer,
“Arsonists at the Cathedral.” - S. J. Gould, Th e Mismea sure of Man (New York: Norton, 1981), 272.
- O. Zuk et al. (2012). “Th e Mystery of Missing Heritability: Ge ne tic Interactions Create
Phantom Heritability,” Proceedings of the National Acad emy of Sciences 109 (January
2012): 1193–1198. - P. Wilby, “Psychologist on a Mission to Give Every Child a Learning Chip,” Guardian
(February 18, 2014), www. theguardian. com / education / 2014 / feb / 18 / psychologist - robert
- plomin - says - genes - crucial - education.
This content downloaded from 139.184.14.159 on Tue, 17 Oct 2017 13:59:14 UTC
http://www.ebook3000.com