For the modeling of the chemical network model which
appears in Fig.3, COPASI v. 4.6.32 software was used. On the
other side, numerical integration was performed of the system of
ODEs Eq. (24) through implementation of the Gear algorithm for
hard equations (“stiff”), in Fortran with double precision and
tolerance of 10^8 [57]. It is important to note that most systems
of ordinary differential equations, derived from biological systems,
have rigidity, i.e., stiffness, which is why it is advisable to use
numerical methods such as predictor corrector, for example the
algorithm of Gear [57]. For bifurcation diagram, the package
TISEAN 3.01 [58] was used for Poincare maps, correlation dimen-
sion, and power spectrum.
In Fig.4 dynamical behavior of the proposed chemical network
model for different values of the control parameterIis shown.
When the value of control parameterIis smaller them the EDO
system Eq. (24) exhibit the maximum complexity.
For “high” values of immune surveillance (I¼4) it exists a
population of proliferating tumor cells, wherexcells are the pre-
dominant, which corresponds to the phase state where a growth
avascular stable steady state is reached, the tumor grows to a state
known as dormant state [33, 35].
Table 1
Stability, and complexity for the system of ODEs (Eq.24) for different values of the control parameterI
(N¼5,H¼3). Reprinted from [83]
I
Eigenvalues of the
Jacobian matrix
Lyapunov
exponentsλj LZ complexity DL
4
Sssstable focus
7.2 10 ^2 5.3i
7.2 10 ^2 þ5.3i
7.8
0.0720024
0.0740862
7.82744
–0
3
Limit cycle
(saddle-foci)
þ8.5
3.3e-001 –1.6i
3.3e-001þ1.6i
~0.00
0.227573
5.89284
0.03589 1
2
Saddle-foci
þ6.3
1.3 10 ^1 1.9i
1.3 10 ^1 þ1.9i
~0.00
0.30561
4.05829
0.03888 1
1
Saddle-node
+10
þ3.0
1.0
~0.00
0.779727
1.87158
0.04187 1
0.7
Limit cycle
þ3.5
4.3 10 ^2 1.5i
4.3 10 ^2 þ1.5i
~0.00
~0.00
2.10445
0.06580 2
0.4 Shilnikov’s
chaos
þ2.8
3.3 10 ^2 1.2i
3.3 10 ^2 þ1.2i
þ0.0519588
~0.00
1.71075
0.08972 2.03
Parameters Estimation in Phase-Space Landscape Reconstruction of Cell Fate... 139