Precision Medicine, CRISPR, and Genome Engineering Moving from Association to Biology and Therapeutics

(Dana P.) #1

86


4.7 Conclusion and Perspectives

Animal models remain the most powerful and widely used genetic tool for studies


of in vivo gene functions and human diseases. The conventional ES cell approaches


are laborious and time-consuming, and the types of the genetic modifications that


can be engineered are limited. The CRISPR/Cas9 system, combined with conven-


tional zygote injection methods, has opened a new era of possibilities for faster and


cheaper animal model production. In our practice, it takes less than a week to pre-


pare the editing reagents for making a simple knockout or small knock-in mouse


model. After zygote collection from donor females, microinjection, and transfer to


recipients, which is a 1-day process, the animals with desired mutations are born in


few weeks. We have experienced firsthand the dramatic change in the practice and


witnessed the power of the genome-engineering technology to shorten the length


required for animal model production and advance the progress of science.


Additionally, the flexibility of the CRISPR/Cas9 system allows for the creation

of genetic tools that were previously unobtainable. We are no longer limited to a


simple genetic manipulation (knockout or knock-in of a short distance of DNA) for


a single gene at a time. We routinely knock out as many as four genes with a single


microinjection. We have also deleted or inverted a DNA fragment as large as 133 kb


and 1.7  Mb, respectively, in mouse zygotes directly by a dual sgRNA strategy.


Nonetheless, the size of the DNA segments to be deleted or inverted can be much


larger than our record [ 43 , 60 ]. In addition to strategically adding or removing base


pairs, the ability of the CRISPR/Cas9 system to target specific sequences can be


harnessed to alter the genome in novel ways. When sgRNA is applied with a cata-


lytically inactive Cas9 (dCas9), the complex can target the specific DNA sequence


without cleaving it [ 61 ]. Therefore, one can fuse a functional protein domain or an


effector to dCas9, and then the dCas9/sgRNA complex can bring the effector to the


specific DNA location to exert its function. For instance, dCas9 can be fused to a


cytidine deaminase that converts cytidine to uridine, and this fusion protein can then


be delivered into mouse zygotes along with specific sgRNAs. Kim et al. [ 62 ] showed


that single-nucleotide substitutions (targeted point mutations) are able to be induced


at a specific locus in mice at a high frequency without using a donor oligo. Liu et al.


[ 63 ] showed that when dCas9 is fused to Tet1, which induces DNA demethylation,


dCas9-Tet1 can change the methylation status of a promoter region in postnatal


mice following a lentiviral-mediated delivery. Therefore, the CRISPR/Cas9 system


has greatly expanded the genetic toolbox for biomedical research. Future animal


models will go beyond DNA modification (knockout or knock-in) and give research-


ers the tools to study areas that were not possible to manipulate in the past, such as


epigenetic modifications, RNA editing, chromosome architecture, and genome


organization. However, the CRISPR/Cas9 system is not perfect yet. Refinements in


targeting specificity are still needed. Although off-target mutations are infrequently


detected in CRISPR-targeted rodents [ 9 , 10 , 64 , 65 ], it remains a concern in the


field. Progress has been made to increase the specificity of Cas9 without losing its


on-target activity based on protein structure engineering [ 66 , 67 ]. Other major


C.L. Yuan and Y.-C. Hu
Free download pdf