SBS14), DBS29 (associated with SBS20), and
DBS37 (associated with SBS26) could all be gen-
erated mathematically from their associated
SBS signatures (fig. S8, E to H), indicating that
these were not true dinucleotides but simply
single-nucleotide variants occurring next to
each other by chance. One exception, DBS24—
associated with SBS90, attributed to duocarmy-cin exposure—has a pattern that can be mostly
recapitulated by simulation of SBS90, apart from
the CT>AA component (fig. S8I). Three sig-
natures (DBS23, DBS32, and DBS35) were notDegasperiet al.,Science 376 , eabl9283 (2022) 22 April 2022 5 of 15
DBS reference signatures, all cohortsDBS260.000.02
0.04
0.06
0.08CAAC>NNCGCTGAGGGTTATGTTAT>NNCACCCGGAGCTAAAAGCC>NNATGAGGGTTATGCG>NNTTATGCGTTATCTTAACT>NNACAGGAGCGGTATCTGGC>NNAAAGATCACGTAATTA>NNCGCTGCGGGTAAAGTC>NNATCACGCTGAGGGTAAACTG>NNATCACCCTGAGCGTAAACTT>NNAGCACCCGGAGCGGGEL
62Hartwig 60ICGC
43DBS220.000.010.020.030.040.050.06CAAC>NNCGCTGAGGGTTATGTTAT>NNCACCCGGAGCTAAACC>NNAGATGAGGGTTATGTTATCG>NNGCGTTATCTTAAACAGCT>NNGAGCGGTATCTGGC>NNAAAGATCACGTATA>NNATCGCTGCGGGTAAAGTC>NNATCACGCTGAGGGTAATG>NNACATCACCCTGAGCGTAAACAGTT>NNCACCCGGAGCGGGEL
4Hartwig 14ICGC
34DBS250.000.050.100.150.200.250.30CAAC>NNCGCTGAGGGTTATGTTAT>NNCACCCGGAGCTAAAAGCC>NNATGAGGGTTATGCG>NNTTATGCGTTATCTTAACT>NNACAGGAGCGGTATCTGGC>NNAAAGATCACGTAATTA>NNCGCTGCGGGTAAAGTC>NNATCACGCTGAGGGTAAACTG>NNATCACCCTGAGCGTAAACTT>NNAGCACCCGGAGCGGGEL
254Hartwig 3ICGC
9DBS200.000.050.100.15CAAC>NNCGCTGAGGGTTATGTTAT>NNCACCCGGAGCTAAAAGCC>NNATGAGGGTTATGCG>NNTTATGCGTTATCTTAACT>NNACAGGAGCGGTATCTGGC>NNAAAGATCACGTAATTA>NNCGCTGCGGGTAAAGTC>NNATCACGCTGAGGGTAAACTG>NNATCACCCTGAGCGTAAACTT>NNAGCACCCGGAGCGGGEL
3929Hartwig 1384ICGC
926DBS130.000.050.100.150.200.250.30CACGCTAC>NNGAGGGTTATGTTAT>NNCACCCGGAGCTAAAAGCC>NNATGAGGGTTATGTTATCG>NNGCGTTATCTTAACT>NNACAGGAGCGGTATCTGGC>NNAAAGATCACGTAATTA>NNCGCTGCGGGTAAAGATTC>NNCACGCTGAGGGTAAACTG>NNATCACCCTGAGCGTAAACTT>NNAGCACCCGGAGCGGGEL
2737Hartwig 1207ICGC
983DBS150.000.020.04
0.060.08CAAC>NNCGCTGAGGGTTATGTTAT>NNCACCCGGAGCTAAAAGCC>NNATGAGGGTTATGTTCG>NNATGCGTTATCTTAACT>NNACAGGAGCGGTATCTGGC>NNAAAGATCACGTAATTA>NNCGCTGCGGGTAAAGTC>NNATCACGCTGAGGGTAAACTG>NNATCACCCTGAGCGTAAACTT>NNAGCACCCGGAGCGGGEL
1015Hartwig 0ICGC
24DBS160.00
0.020.040.060.080.10CAAC>NNCGCTGAGGGTTATGTTAT>NNCACCCGGAGCTAAAAGCC>NNATGAGGGTTATGCG>NNTTATGCGTTATCTTAACT>NNACAGGAGCGGTATCTGGC>NNAAAGATCACGTAATTA>NNCGCTGCGGGTAAAGTC>NNATCACGCTGAGGGTAAACTG>NNATCACCCTGAGCGTAAACTT>NNAGCACCCGGAGCGGGEL
4Hartwig 1ICGC
1DBS170.000.050.100.15CACGAC>NNCTGAGGGTTATGTTAT>NNCACCCGGAGCTAAACC>NNAGATGAGGGTTATGTTATCG>NNGCGTTATCTTAACT>NNACAGGAGCGGTATCTGGC>NNAAAGATCACGTAATTA>NNCGCTGCGGGTAAAGATTC>NNCACGCTGAGGGTAAACTG>NNATCACCCTGAGCGTAAACTT>NNAGCACCCGGAGCGGGEL
1Hartwig 0ICGC
3DBS230.000.050.100.15CACGAC>NNCTGAGGGTTATGTTAT>NNCACCCGGAGCTAAACC>NNAGATGAGGGTTATGTTATCG>NNGCGTTATCTTAACT>NNACAGGAGCGGTATCTGGC>NNAAAGATCACGTAATTA>NNCGCTGCGGGTAAAGATTC>NNCACGCTGAGGGTAAACTG>NNATCACCCTGAGCGTAAACTT>NNAGCACCCGGAGCGGGEL
0Hartwig 0ICGC
5Biliary
Bladder
Bone_SoftTissueBreast
CNS
ColorectalEsophagus
Head_neck
KidneyLiver
Lung
LymphoidMyeloid
NET
Oral_OropharyngealOvary
Pancreas
ProstateSkin
Stomach
UterusGEL−2136826−11 (282 TNVs)01020304050faff4626−615b−416a−b7a6−9d177dcc94a9 (62 TNVs)051015CPCT02050104T (182 TNVs)010203040Examples of samples with TBS signatures (DBS25)ADE
TTT>AAA
TTT>GAA
TTT>
CAA TTG>AAA TTC>AAA-0.50.00.51.0Pearson correlationall
DBS11SBS2 DBS13SBS8 DBS20SBS8 DBS26SBS17 DBS5SBS111 DBS16SBS10d DBS22SBS9 DBS12SBS105 DBS24SBS90GEL
ICGC
Hartwig4 3 5 10 13 12 12 12 12 224 1 03 1 00 110 2 00 002samples
0100020003000400050006000DBS20DBS13DBS2DBS15DBS1DBS5DBS11DBS25DBS18DBS26DBS8DBS4DBS22DBS10DBS3DBS14DBS16DBS23DBS7DBS17DBS29DBS12DBS24DBS35DBS30DBS32DBS37Smoking
UV lightPlatinum-based theraphyAPOBECPlatinum-based theraphy
POLE dysregulationPOLE dysregulationMMR+POLE deficiencyMMR deficiencyTreatmentTreatmentMMR deficiencyin COSMIC
not in COSMIC-10-9-8-7-6-5position relative to CC>TT-4-3-2-1^0012345678910count050100150(^200) A
C
T
G
B
C
Sequence context of the CC>TT mutations in GEL-2373213-11,
sample with high DBS11 exposure, associated with APOBEC-related SBS2
Correlation of DBS with SBS exposures across organs and cohorts
number of organsin which correlation
was observed
Previously unreported, in cis DBS signatures
TTT>AAA
TTT>GAA
TTT>
CAA TTG>AAA TTC>AAA
TTT>AAA
TTT>GAA
TTT>
CAA TTG>AAA TTC>AAA
Fig. 3. DBS signatures across the cohort.(A) Frequency of DBS signatures in
the present study. (B) Flanking sequence context surrounding mutated
dinucleotides of DBS11, which is correlated with APOBEC-related SBS2, to
demonstrate a preference for the TpCCpN context, similar to the TpCpN
sequence predilection of APOBECs. (C) Correlation of DBSs with SBS exposures
across cohorts. Numbers in each column report the number of organs implicated
in the correlative analyses. A correlation is computed independently for each
organ. Correlations are displayed as a box plots, which denote median (horizontal
line) and 25th to 75th percentiles (boxes). The lower and upper whiskers span
1.5 times the interquartile range (1.5 × IQR). (D) Examples of previously unreported
DBS signatures. (E) Samples with TBS1. The total numbers of samples and triple-
nucleotide variants are too low to perform a formal mutational signature analysis. All
DBS signatures identified in the present study can be viewed athttps://signal.
mutationalsignatures.com/explore/study/6?mutationType=2.
RESEARCH | RESEARCH ARTICLE