274 Roberts
remain committed to the idea that the creation of a boundary between
science and religion need not, and should not, contribute to their mutual
estrangement.NOTES
I am indebted to Frederick Gregory, Peter Harrison, Bernard Lightman, and Michael
Shank for providing me with very helpful responses to earlier drafts of this paper. Ron
Numbers has read and commented helpfully on so many drafts that I feel somewhat
guilty that I have not listed him as a coauthor. As always, I have benefi ted enormously
from the love and support of my wife, Sharon (ILYS), and my son, Jeff.- Kenneth J. Howell, God’s Two Books: Copernican Cosmology and Biblical Interpreta-
tion in Early Modern Science (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2002);
Peter Harrison, The Bible, Protestantism, and the Rise of Natural Science (New York: Cam-
bridge University Press, 1998), 268–69; and Ronald L. Numbers, “Reading the Book of
Nature through American Lenses,” in The Book of Nature in Early Modern and Modern
History, ed. Klaas van Berkel and Arjo Vanderjag (Leuven: Peeters, 2006), 261–74. - Peter Harrison, “‘Science’ and ‘Religion’: Constructing the Boundaries,” Journal
of Religion 86 (2006): 92–93; Peter Harrison, “Religion” and the Religions in the English
Enlightenment (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1990), 1–14. - Isaac Newton [1706], quoted in Andrew Cunningham, “How the Principia Got
Its Name: Or, Taking Natural Philosophy Seriously,” History of Science 29 (1991): 384;
John Winthrop IV [1753], quoted in Charles Edwin Clark, “Science, Reason, and an
Angry God: The Literature of an Earthquake,” New England Quarterly 38 (1965): 353
(original emphasis). More generally, see Harrison, “‘Science’ and ‘Religion,’” 81–91. - Robert M. Young, “Natural Theology, Victorian Periodicals and the Fragmenta-
tion of a Common Context,” in Darwin’s Metaphor: Nature’s Place in Victorian Culture
(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985), 126–50; [Orville Dewey], “Diffusion
of Knowledge,” North American Review 30 (1830): 312; Review of The Indications of the
Creator, by George Taylor, Knickerbocker 39 (1852): 85; Samuel Harris, “The Harmony of
Natural Science and Theology,” New Englander 10 (1852): 16. - William North Rice, “The Darwinian Theory of the Origin of Species,” New
Englander 26 (1867): 608. See also Charles Darwin, On the Origin of Species by Means of
Natural Section, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life, facsimile ed.
(1859;Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1964), 413, 481–83; Ronald L. Num-
bers, “Science Without God: Natural Laws and Christian Beliefs,” in When Science and
Christianity Meet, ed. David C. Lindberg and Ronald L. Numbers (Chicago: University of
Chicago Press, 2003), 272–79, 282. - Numbers, “Science Without God,” 265–85; Sydney Ross, “Scientist: The Story of
a Word,” Annals of Science 18 (1962): 65–85. - Charles Hodge, What Is Darwinism? (New York: Scribner, Armstrong and Com-
pany, 1874), 127; James T. Bixby, Similarities of Physical and Religious Knowledge (New
York: D. Appleton and Company, 1876), 16–17, 67–68 (quotes, 67; original emphasis).