Table 13.1Summary of analysis one of the population consequences of body size
on population density, the response variable. M¼body mass, S¼species richness,
T¼trophy, TB¼bacterivores, TO¼omnivores. M:T¼interaction term between M
and T. *¼p<0.05; **¼p<0.01; ***¼p<0.001.
Analysis of variance (ANOVA) table
Df Sum sq Mean sq F value Pr(>F)
M 1 482.36 482.36 805.1509 <2.2e16***
S 1 4.34 4.34 7.2508 0.007734**
T 2 8.35 4.17 6.9687 0.001207**
M:T 2 5.26 2.63 4.3883 0.013734*
Residuals 186 111.43 0.60
Coefficients
Estimate Std. error t value Pr(>|t|)
(Intercept) 0.84994 0.42476 2.001 0.04685*
M 0.92967 0.06802 13.668 <2e16***
S 0.04101 0.01331 3.081 0.00237**
TB 0.22936 0.50877 0.451 0.65265
TO 1.25460 0.54686 2.294 0.02290*
M:TB 0.13027 0.09105 1.431 0.15420
M:TO 0.43899 0.14999 2.927 0.00385**
2 species
4 species
6 species
8 species
1
2
3
4
(a)
–7 –6 –5 –4 –3 –2
Log 10 (Cell mass (mg))
Log
(Density per ml) 10
Constant
Fast variation
Slow variation
1
2
3
4
(b)
–7 –6 –5 –4 –3 –2
Log 10 (Cell mass (mg))
Log
10
(Density per ml)
Figure 13.3Size-abundance relationship for analysis three, which tests for influence of
(a) species richness, (b) environmental variability on the slope of the relationship.
254 O.L. PETCHEYET AL.