9780521861724htl 1..2

(Jacob Rumans) #1

contained one plant species, 19 herbivores, 66 parasitoids, 60 predators, five
omnivores and three pathogens. They plotted log consumer-species length as a
function of log resource-species length with separate symbols for parasitoids,
pathogens and predators (their Fig. 7) but they did not report estimates of
allometric relations nor list the length data, though they did provide the food-
web data. According to Leaper and Huxham ( 2002 ), the web reported by
Memmottet al.(2000) was the first and until 2002 the only published food web
to present body masses for both parasites (in fact, they were parasitoids) and
other consumers. Leaper and Huxham ( 2002 ) calculated but did not publish
body masses of 160 of the 171 taxa in the food web of the Ythan estuary: 113
average adult body weights and mean weights for the given life-history stage of
the remaining 47 taxa. They reported Pearson’sr^2 for log 10 consumer and log 10
resource body masses for six versions of the web: including non-parasites only,
parasites only, and all taxa; and for each group of taxa, with and without
distinguishing life stages according to their trophic relations. No regression
coefficients of log 10 consumer body mass on log 10 resource body mass were
given. The correlations were positive in all cases and were statistically signifi-
cantly different from zero at the 0.001 level except for parasites only, disregard-
ing differences among life stages.


Discussion
Hutchinson ( 1959 , p. 147) examined ‘the order of magnitude of the diversity that
a single food chain can introduce into a community’. It is worthwhile to revisit
his influential calculations in the light of data and theory available since he
wrote. Hutchinson assumed that ‘in general 20 per cent of the energy passing


terrestrial A

terrestrial B

Vezina 1985

–6 –4 –2 0 2 4 6

–6

–4

–2

0

2

4

6

8

log10 weight (g) of predator

(b)


log10 weight (g) of prey

Figure 16.3(cont.)


BODY SIZES IN FOOD CHAINS 319
Free download pdf