fishes had little effect on algal biomass initially, per-
haps because sea urchin grazing compensated for
the reduced fish grazing (Hay 1984; Hughes 1994;
Jacksonet al. 2001). But when sea urchins suffered
mass mortality from disease, algal biomass exploded
(Carpenter 1990). Macroalgal blooms proliferated
only after both fishes and sea urchins were reduced.
These observed patterns are consistent with experi-
ments and comparisons among protected and fished
areas on Kenyan reefs, which showed that sea urch-
ins were more abundant on overfished reefs than in
protected areas, but that experimental reduction of
urchins allowed large macroalgae to dominate only
on fished reefs, where herbivorous fishes were0.80
0.60
0.40
0.20
0.000.801.000.60
0.40
0.20
0.000.801.000.60
0.40
0.20
0.000.120.15
SoleCodWhitingNorway poutHerring All speciesSandeelSaitheHaddockPlaice0.09
0.06
0.03
0.005.00
4.00
3.00
2.00
1.00
0.005.00
4.00
3.00
2.00
1.00
0.0016.0
12.0
8.0
4.0
0.01.60
1.20
0.80
0.40
0.001.20
1.00
0.80
0.60
0.40
0.20
0.001.50
1.20
0.90
0.60
0.20
0.001976 1980 1984 1988 19921976 1980 1984 1988 19921976 1980 1984 1988 19921976 1980 1984 1988 19921976 1980 1984
Year Year1976 1980 1984 1988 1992 1988 19921976 1980 1984 1988 19921976 1980 1984 1988 19921976 1980 1984 1988 1992Biomass (tonnes x 10 1976 19806 )Biomass (tonnes x 106 )Biomass (tonnes x 106 )Biomass (tonnes x 106 )Biomass (tonnes x 106 )1984 1988 1992Figure 8.5Biodiversity begets stability. The temporal trend in aggregate fish biomass (bottom right) is substantially less
variable than the time series for any individual species. Reproduced with permission from Jennings and Kaiser (1998).
106 APPLICATIONS